We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
ELITE 11+ glitch loving, barmy bargain hunters
Options
Comments
-
morning dotty. lfab and T42:wave:
Yes abailey as she is having her right done , i had left so can make one good one out of us 2:rotfl::rotfl::rotfl:
Hello gorgeous!! :wave: sorry for late reply, only just back online! How are you doing after your procedure??? Hope you are back to your lovely self cos you're an :A
if you don't have anything nice to say, keep schtum.0 -
Mildred1970 wrote: »Bad luck mt2m
This has no doubt already been covered but if the Impulse or H&S was used as trigger could 2 of the shampoos be bought to compare...I quite fancy some of the poo
I believe you'd have to do it instore for it to work as the shampoo is listed as conditioner on a.com (As well as the conditioner) so I think you might not get the right one delivered... Depends on how the A system works. If it goes by the description it won't work but if it goes by picture or barcode you'd be ok. 0 -
Hello gorgeous!! :wave: sorry for late reply, only just back online! How are you doing after your procedure??? Hope you are back to your lovely self cos you're an :A
Hello:D
Im ok will take a few weeks to be back to normal:eek: if i ever was normal:rotfl::rotfl:
Hubby dont think im an:A at the mo he thinks im a pain in the butt:pSealed pot challenge number 003 £350 for 2015, 2016 £400 Actual£345, £400 for 2017 Actual £500:T:T £770 for 2018 £1295 for 2019:j:j spc number 22 £1,457Stopped Smoking 22/01/15:D:D::dance::dance:- 5 st 1 1/2lb :dance::dance:0 -
Its going to cost big style :eek:
Its a gamble you make your choice and live with it good or bad.
Wish we had a vote :cool:
Fair enough. I personally think it's a risk worth taking for Scotland. I started out more towards a no vote but I've done a bit of research and what not and my opinions have changed
Wouldn't be very fair if you lot had a vote seeing as there's a lot more of you
Not long to go now and we'll know one way or t'other
Afternoon all
Waiting on Mr Flab getting home so I can run out and do my coupon shop ...those who mind don't matter, and those who matter don't mind.
PRIDE
There's a fork in the road, which way will you go
You standing still or will you step into the great unknown,
Is yours to decide, this is your life.
0 -
I've been refraining from getting involved, not sure if there are any regulations that prevent me, for example, campaigning in public but not part of an officially-funded campaign, but, if so, so what - if anyone is directly exhorting people to vote no, or yes, then I can no longer hold back!!
(Not that anything Savvy says would affect anyone and - would I actually turn people off:think: and end up having people voting the opposite way to my own wish?)
But, anyway, I'm can no longer resist!!
Vote YES.
Absolutely - go for it, grab the opportunity and just go!! Go now! I don't mean that offensively, I don't want to see the back of you, I love you and think you'll be a great success as an independent country. You know it makes sense! In fact, if there is a vote for independence, I'm even thinking of moving up there myself, before the 'borders close'. Seriously, though, I don't think the borders will close - at least not as drastically as painted - there are places on the Irish/Northern Ireland border for example where all you can see change is the road markings, no physical border.
Really the reason why the countries are as they are is all historical. There is no reason why the extent of certain countries should extend to or be limited to the places they are - it is all just historical and all a creation of human beings. Different economic units of different sizes all have ability to function successfully. Some successful economies have similar numbers of people - Singapore? If you see the weather map on UK weather broadcasts on the BBC and look over the Sea, you can see Denmark - looks similar size to Scotland, though I suspect the size and shape of Scotland has been distorted by the BBC projection to appear less than what it is - this itself would be no longer, under a national broadcaster that focused on Scotland!!
The 'no' campaign are, as usual for similar campaigns, appealing to people's emotion at the last stages. Don't let it! Don't be taken in - the three leaders' pledge - you know it will be stuck in the trappings of Westminster. As for the protecting of shipbuilding and other industry, I understand we've heard these arguments before, the same arguments were made just before the 1979 Scottish Assembly referendum in order to try to make people doubt. And, what did the Scottish people get - did they get a self-determining Scottish authority of its own that could protect and fight for those industries as a nation - no, they got Mrs Thatcher. Coal industries, shipping industries - much diminished ever since.
What the 'no' campaigners are saying in fact precisely plays into my hands (or would do if I had a vote, but that's by the bye). David Cameron said independent would be permanent and irreversible. Good. I want permanent, irreversible independence. That is precisely what I want independence to be. Do you think I would want temporary independence? Absolutely not! It should be full and irreversible, especially so that you get the Government you vote for each time, rather than every time a Government largely determined by England (and, more to the point, a few pockets of the South of England which are marginal seats and where the votes count).
And, as for voting for the status quo, and for "no" protecting the NHS, do you really think that backdoor privatisation would be avoided by having a Conversative government led from Westminster? That's what more often results and, despite the fact that Scottish independence would almost certainly mean a perpetual Conversative government for England, Wales and Northern Ireland, I still think Scotland should take the opportunity and become independent. Take the control away from the current control of funding by Westminster, and take it for yourselves and that way Scotland, you will protect your NHS more effectively.
Indeed, the 'status quo' doesn't seem to be an option anymore - if so, and if more power to Scotland under 'no' - then why not vote 'yes' anyway as that is, indeed, the only way to ensure the protection of the NHS - do you want a Conservative-influenced government from mainly English votes to be left with that and do you trust such a government to deliver it for you?
Gordon Brown says do you really think that they (Labour) would allow privatisation in the NHS? Well, they didn't stop privatisation of the Royal Mail did they?
The answer is Yes, I think they would allow the NHS to be privatisated. So, Scotland, take the choice and vote YES to avoid all that possibility and, indeed, that risk!
As for setting up conflict, hasn't anyone heard of international cooperation? We would be best allies and would I am sure be in support of each other most often, whilst each having control to do what is best for ourself. I am sure that, if a vote was for independence - and it needs every vote it can get - so VOTE YES - once that vote was the outcome, it would concentrate the minds of people and work to ensure Scotland is a success.
I want you to take independence and wish you all success. So, certainly do not get the impression and I am sure you have not, that all English people want Scotland to remain in the UK.
This is a great opportunity - for radical change, to make things for the better. All too often the problem is that any change is incremental and very slow, and it needs a radical shake, if importantly to shake the minds of those with vested interests in preserving and maintaining the current arrangements (of being in the UK) - such as it might be said 'all these politicians that hold, or have held, seats in Westminster governments'. There is no reason to preserve the UK necessarily. Remember that when the Union was formed in 1707, if there had been a referendum then, the Scottish people would have very substantially voted against joining the Union in the first place, as would those in England. They talk about industrial revolution but, to be fair, the industrial period and the middle ages are two different time periods. We are where we are - and Scotland and the rest of the current UK (which does not have to stay that way perpetuity) are where we are and there is now a great opportunity for both parts to prosper separately, do not be influenced by emotive terms that say this is a "divorce" when it is not similar to that at all!
VOTE YES.0 -
lookinforabargain wrote: »Fair enough. I personally think it's a risk worth taking for Scotland. I started out more towards a no vote but I've done a bit of research and what not and my opinions have changed
Wouldn't be very fair if you lot had a vote seeing as there's a lot more of you
Not long to go now and we'll know one way or t'other
Afternoon all
Waiting on Mr Flab getting home so I can run out and do my coupon shop
:eek:
How about all the "yes" voters pay higher taxes and if your gamble pays off then you get a higher pension than the "no" voters?
That's a risk I'd be happy taking Apparently, everybody knows that the bird is [strike]the word[/strike] a moorhen0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 351.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.7K Spending & Discounts
- 244.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177K Life & Family
- 257.6K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards