We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Put it in the over head locker the other way...
richardw
Posts: 19,470 Forumite
Posts are not advice and must not be relied upon.
0
Comments
-
Shame Alaska didnt have them when I flew with them, they may then have had room for my bags rather than leave them on the tarmac0 -
This claim is based on a standard size carry-on bag measuring 9in x 14in x 22in (23cm x 36cm x 56cm).
Since when is that a "standard size"?0 -
Yes, 36cm is much smaller than the IATA standard width of 45cm.Posts are not advice and must not be relied upon.0
-
And even smaller than Easyjet's guaranteed cabin space size of 40cm. I think 36cm is wishful thinking on the part of the airlines.0
-
alanrowell wrote: »Since when is that a "standard size"?
Made to suit Delta Airlines and United Airlines (all bar 1cm for United).0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.4K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.4K Spending & Discounts
- 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.4K Life & Family
- 261.6K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards