We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

before probate

1235»

Comments

  • Mojisola
    Mojisola Posts: 35,571 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    CLOUDS wrote: »
    Original question

    How do you challenge a tenant s in common share? I didn't want to see a property lawyer aswell... so if any one has experience in this then please post the answer. Thanks.

    Well, you can't challenge it on the basis that the person didn't contribute towards the cost of the property which seems to be your complaint.
  • g6jns_2
    g6jns_2 Posts: 1,214 Forumite
    CLOUDS wrote: »
    Lol. I'm not about to put all details here at once... like I have repatedly said its complicated. I have seen solicitors and a barrister. And like I have said before there advice varies. Due to the fact that this case covers so many different areas.

    Original question

    How do you challenge a tenant s in common share? I didn't want to see a property lawyer aswell... so if any one has experience in this then please post the answer. Thanks.
    As you have been repeatedly told just because someone did not contribute to the cost is no grounds whatsoever to challenge it. Nor do any of the side issues you keep lobbing into the argument. What you have said is only complicated because your story keeps changing. Unless you can produce a straightforward concise account then nobody can help you except yourself.
  • getmore4less
    getmore4less Posts: 46,882 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper I've helped Parliament
    What you seem to be wanting to do is establish the benificial shares are at some % other than the default.

    you should start their not the distribution of the estate.
  • CLOUDS
    CLOUDS Posts: 15 Forumite
    Thanks. I don't think I can do this before being an administrator. I spoke again to a solicitor. It is possible to challenge. However it is going to take a long time and lots of effort on my part. Hence the delay. . I have been advised to speak to the probate registry. ... basically I can take up court orders for the share problem.

    Doing nothing is also good! But doesn't get any thing sorted out.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 601.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.6K Life & Family
  • 259.2K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.