We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Ombudsman Turns down my PPI Claim

HI All, I really hope someone out there can help me.
I have an extremely water tight case for a PPI refund as I should not have been sold the policy in the first place as I had a pre-existing condition that they knew about and knew they wouldn't pay on!!
Anyhow... the PPI was with First PLus, underwritten by Ocean Finance who the went bust! I tried all avenues... writing to first plus, Ocean Finance, then I found out that that was underwritten by Lloyds insurance and I basically hit a dead end at each turn.
I then decided to take it to the ombudsman as, as i've previously mentioned, my claim in water tight. After 2 years of waiting (and communication with the Ombudsman) i've been told that they can not take it forward as they can not decipher who, in my case, should accept responsibility. The merits of my personal case have not even been reviewed as they are unable to pin the liability onto 1 particular body!! I am livid as they are saying, sorry, but there is nothing we can do! I asked to have the case reviewed, but they said the case hadn't even been reviewed because they need someone to pay out!!
Where do I go from here. Someone has suggested I contact my local politician and someone else suggested Martin. I'm sure he personally won't be interested as he's probably inundated with these kind of situations, but I seriously need some help as I don't know where else to go. I have ALL the documentation to back up the claim, and Like I mentioned previously, it is water tight.
The issues relating to the pay out are due to the fact Ocean Finance, as it was then, (back in 2003), was solvent. It then went bust and re-opened as Ocean Finance & Mortgages!
Please, someone, help... or let me know what you suggest and whether my local MP is a good idea.
Thanks:mad:
«1

Comments

  • Nasqueron
    Nasqueron Posts: 11,259 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    Would it not pay out at all, or would only not pay out for claims on that specific condition?

    e.g. if you had heart issues, they may not pay out for that but would do so if say you had another health issue?

    May well have problems getting money if the seller is no longer trading though.

    Sam Vimes' Boots Theory of Socioeconomic Unfairness: 

    People are rich because they spend less money. A poor man buys $10 boots that last a season or two before he's walking in wet shoes and has to buy another pair. A rich man buys $50 boots that are made better and give him 10 years of dry feet. The poor man has spent $100 over those 10 years and still has wet feet.

  • societys_child
    societys_child Posts: 7,110 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Not sure what your MP can do about it?
  • -taff
    -taff Posts: 15,578 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    You have no chance. Forget about it.
    It's pre regulation and Richard Newey is never going to give you any money back.
    Non me fac calcitrare tuum culi
  • roonaldo
    roonaldo Posts: 3,420 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    The seller of the policy is Ocean Finance who don't exist and who were also not regulated at the time anyway, FOS or your MP cannot change this.

    You have no recourse to go to the FSCS due to the date.
  • dunstonh
    dunstonh Posts: 121,109 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    I have an extremely water tight case for a PPI refund as I should not have been sold the policy in the first place as I had a pre-existing condition that they knew about and knew they wouldn't pay on!!

    Pre-existing conditions are only a valid complaint reason when the condition is severe enough to prevent claims in most other areas. e.g. back pains would a pre-existing condition but it would not be a mis-sale as you would be covered in all other areas not linked to back pains.
    I then decided to take it to the ombudsman as, as i've previously mentioned, my claim in water tight. After 2 years of waiting (and communication with the Ombudsman) i've been told that they can not take it forward as they can not decipher who, in my case, should accept responsibility.

    If it was a pre-regulation sale (which it is) and the seller is no longer trading or with assets then the FOS cannot take it on.
    I am livid as they are saying, sorry, but there is nothing we can do! I asked to have the case reviewed, but they said the case hadn't even been reviewed because they need someone to pay out!!

    The FOS do not have a remit to review it. They can only review post Jan 2005 cases where the firm are still trading or earlier cases where the firm was a member of an earlier body but the firm are still trading.
    Where do I go from here.

    You give up.
    Someone has suggested I contact my local politician and someone else suggested Martin.

    Neither of them can circumvent the law.

    Your problems are:

    1 - The liability for the sale is with the seller. The seller no longer exists.
    2 - You bought it prior to insurance regulation and do not benefit from the FSCS which will only consider sales made after January 2005.
    3 - The FOS have no remit to review this case as its pre-regulation and the firm no longer exists.
    I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.
  • alsmals wrote: »
    HI All, I really hope someone out there can help me.
    I have an extremely water tight case for a PPI refund as I should not have been sold the policy in the first place as I had a pre-existing condition that they knew about and knew they wouldn't pay on!!
    Anyhow... the PPI was with First PLus, underwritten by Ocean Finance who the went bust! I tried all avenues... writing to first plus, Ocean Finance, then I found out that that was underwritten by Lloyds insurance and I basically hit a dead end at each turn.
    I then decided to take it to the ombudsman as, as i've previously mentioned, my claim in water tight. After 2 years of waiting (and communication with the Ombudsman) i've been told that they can not take it forward as they can not decipher who, in my case, should accept responsibility. The merits of my personal case have not even been reviewed as they are unable to pin the liability onto 1 particular body!! I am livid as they are saying, sorry, but there is nothing we can do! I asked to have the case reviewed, but they said the case hadn't even been reviewed because they need someone to pay out!!
    Where do I go from here. Someone has suggested I contact my local politician and someone else suggested Martin. I'm sure he personally won't be interested as he's probably inundated with these kind of situations, but I seriously need some help as I don't know where else to go. I have ALL the documentation to back up the claim, and Like I mentioned previously, it is water tight.
    The issues relating to the pay out are due to the fact Ocean Finance, as it was then, (back in 2003), was solvent. It then went bust and re-opened as Ocean Finance & Mortgages!
    Please, someone, help... or let me know what you suggest and whether my local MP is a good idea.
    Thanks:mad:
    It has been held that the broker can be the deemed agent of the lender for the purposes of S140A of the Consumer Credit Act and you should consider an action against Firstplus. You should also have a look at the European Court of Justice case no C-653/11 between HMRC and Mr. Paul Newey who owns Ocean Finance and is as far as I am aware a sole trader. Has he been bankrupted? You may consider that if the deal was actually done by his Jersey based company whether you were misled.
  • Insider101
    Insider101 Posts: 1,062 Forumite
    benlms wrote: »
    It has been held that the broker can be the deemed agent of the lender for the purposes of S140A of the Consumer Credit Act and you should consider an action against Firstplus. You should also have a look at the European Court of Justice case no C-653/11 between HMRC and Mr. Paul Newey who owns Ocean Finance and is as far as I am aware a sole trader. Has he been bankrupted? You may consider that if the deal was actually done by his Jersey based company whether you were misled.

    The problem with this one is it is a legal issue. If you take a legal action then whilst in theory the lender can be liable for the actions of the seller, it is not going to go anywhere without solid proof and the onus is on the person making the assertion to provide it.
  • Brokerwise
    Brokerwise Posts: 177 Forumite
    alsmals wrote: »
    HI All, I really hope someone out there can help me.
    I have an extremely water tight case for a PPI refund as I should not have been sold the policy in the first place as I had a pre-existing condition that they knew about and knew they wouldn't pay on!!
    Anyhow... the PPI was with First PLus, underwritten by Ocean Finance who the went bust! I tried all avenues... writing to first plus, Ocean Finance, then I found out that that was underwritten by Lloyds insurance and I basically hit a dead end at each turn.
    I then decided to take it to the ombudsman as, as i've previously mentioned, my claim in water tight. After 2 years of waiting (and communication with the Ombudsman) i've been told that they can not take it forward as they can not decipher who, in my case, should accept responsibility. The merits of my personal case have not even been reviewed as they are unable to pin the liability onto 1 particular body!! I am livid as they are saying, sorry, but there is nothing we can do! I asked to have the case reviewed, but they said the case hadn't even been reviewed because they need someone to pay out!!
    Where do I go from here. Someone has suggested I contact my local politician and someone else suggested Martin. I'm sure he personally won't be interested as he's probably inundated with these kind of situations, but I seriously need some help as I don't know where else to go. I have ALL the documentation to back up the claim, and Like I mentioned previously, it is water tight.
    The issues relating to the pay out are due to the fact Ocean Finance, as it was then, (back in 2003), was solvent. It then went bust and re-opened as Ocean Finance & Mortgages!
    Please, someone, help... or let me know what you suggest and whether my local MP is a good idea.
    Thanks:mad:

    Ocean Finance never went bust
  • Brokerwise wrote: »
    Ocean Finance never went bust
    There have beenv four companies called Ocean Finance Limited according to Companies House. Three are dissolved - so nobody to claim against.

    One is dormant. In theory you could chase them but only if they are the "right" Ocean Finance Limited.

    If you do they may have no money and in any event it predates regulation.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 353.9K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 246.9K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 603.5K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.3K Life & Family
  • 261.1K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.