We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Diesel Drivers to be taxed more?
Comments
- 
            They should just bring the old VED system back, e.g. one charge for cars 1.2L or less, 1.6 or less, 2.0 or less, etc.0
- 
            Deleted_User wrote: »They should just bring the old VED system back, e.g. one charge for cars 1.2L or less, 1.6 or less, 2.0 or less, etc.
 They definitely should.
 Me and Oh have the same make and model, but mines a 1.6 petrol car and his is the 1.9TDi van version of the car.
 Our Tax band is exactly the same.0
- 
            
 And if your vehicles were both on the pre-2001, engine-size rather than CO2, tax banding - they still would be. And so would next door's Ferrari.hgotsparkle wrote: »They definitely should.
 Me and Oh have the same make and model, but mines a 1.6 petrol car and his is the 1.9TDi van version of the car.
 Our Tax band is exactly the same.
 Two bands, <1550cc, 1550cc=>0
- 
            Deleted_User wrote: »They should just bring the old VED system back, e.g. one charge for cars 1.2L or less, 1.6 or less, 2.0 or less, etc.
 I don't think that system makes any sense with modern cars as the use of turbochargers and occasionally superchargers means the cubic capacity of an engine has increasingly less relation to performance/emissions.
 John0
- 
            VED as it stands makes little sense anyway.
 I have two cars, one costs me 200 a year tax, the other 220.
 The first does 14000 miles, the second does less than 1000.
 Something needs to change.....
 Classic car owners shouldn't be punished for their hobby.“I may not agree with you, but I will defend to the death your right to make an a** of yourself.”
 <><><><><><><><><<><><><><><><><><><><><><> Don't forget to like and subscribe \/ \/ \/0
- 
            Strider590 wrote: »I have two cars, one costs me 200 a year tax, the other 220.
 The first does 14000 miles, the second does less than 1000.
 And how much fuel duty, IPT and VAT does each contribute?Classic car owners shouldn't be punished for their hobby.
 Perhaps if VED was free for older vehicles? Say, 40yr and older, with the exemption rolling? That'd be a good idea, wouldn't it?
 (And, fwiw, I speak here as somebody with a stack of '80s vehicles...)0
- 
            
 Perhaps if VED was free for older vehicles? Say, 40yr and older, with the exemption rolling? That'd be a good idea, wouldn't it?
 Your wish is their command 
 https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/vehicle-excise-duty-40-year-rolling-exemption-for-classic-vehiclesI want to go back to The Olden Days, when every single thing that I can think of was better.....
 (except air quality and Medical Science )0 )0
- 
            My view of classic car owners are that they never go anywhere in their classic car apart from rocking back and forwards between their garage and drive. They are all under the impression that you need a new sub 3 year old car to drive anyway. Even to the corner shop and back.
 If they are going to make VED free for classic cars then they should make it free for anything over 10 years old. Then us bangernomics who actually drive old cars on a daily basis can benefit too.0
- 
            Look around at the commercial vehicles. Mainly diesel, Taxis, mainly diesel, Trains, quite a lot diesel, Buses, diesel, ships diesel. Then remove them all and insist they be petrol, not enough capacity at car makers, refineries, steelworks, plastics fabricators, etc. And let's not tax the commercial vehicles, taxis, trains and ships. Let's instead tax the motorist first and add a further tax as they will be trapped until they can afford a petrol, lpg or electric car and/or the manufacturers can supply the inevitable demand. As with those inefficient boilers and the "Scrappage scheme". Wouldn't it be tempting for the government to now tell motorists to scrap their cars and get a payout towards a new non-polluting vehicle? :cool:0
- 
            Look around at the commercial vehicles. Mainly diesel, Taxis, mainly diesel, Trains, quite a lot diesel, Buses, diesel, ships diesel. :cool:
 You left out the generators being purchased by the score, which will be run on diesel when the lights start to go out during winter as the 'green' energy solutions don't work and the remaining coal and the remaining gas power stations can't cope with demand.
 What is needed is a consistent policy, not a bunch of thick politicians pandering to an infantile, noisy 'green' lobby. The entire basis on which vehicles are taxed needs an overhaul.0
This discussion has been closed.
            Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
 
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259.1K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
![[Deleted User]](https://us-noi.v-cdn.net/6031891/uploads/defaultavatar/nFA7H6UNOO0N5.jpg)
 
          
          
         