We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Protecting House from fees/tax
Goggleboxer
Posts: 1 Newbie
I am worried about losing my house to possible care fees/tax later in life and want to explore options to protect it. I have heard of one method where I set up a company which buys my house for a nominal amount with myself and wife and offspring as directors. The house would belong to the company and therefore "safe".
This sounds a bit complicated but does it even work?? Would there be annual costs of having a company that does essentially does nothing?
This sounds a bit complicated but does it even work?? Would there be annual costs of having a company that does essentially does nothing?
0
Comments
-
If your wife is still living in the property then there is no requirement to sell the house to fund care.
It is just you that is considered at risk? Is there any real reason or is this just a general concern?0 -
the house will be safe for your wife and yourself as it can't be sold while one of you is alive and living there.
As for passing it on, it is your house and your money. Which should be spent on good quality care should you or your wife need it. As care homes that the council pay 100% for are not the sort of care homes you would want to be in or would want your wife to be in.
If you want to leave something to your children, give it to them now before you are old enough to need care.
But most people dont go into a care home.0 -
-
You do not need to worry if your spouse is still living in the home if you were to go into care, or vice versa.
A problem may arise where the spouse living at home dies first while you are in care. Obviously you could give your home away to your children and continue to live in it (but beware this is not effective for IHT, since it is a gift with reservation, and also may be seen as deprivation of assets for care purposes).
In cases where it is not possible or you don't want to gift the home away, you should look at changing the you own your home to "tenants in common" (as opposed to joint tenancy) if it is not already, and update your Will. This means that you each own a defined share (usually equal) of the property and upon first death does not automatically go to the surviving spouse but to anyone you wish (e.g. your children, or a trust).
The worst case scenario would be for you to be assessed as owning only half the share in the property to pay for care fees.Stephen Covey once said that "when you teach once, you learn twice". That is the primary reason for my participation on the forums as an IFA.
Although I strive to provide accurate information in my posts, there may be the odd time when I fail. Yes I know it's hard to believe but even Your Hero can make mistakes. Apologies in advance.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.4K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.4K Spending & Discounts
- 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.4K Life & Family
- 261.6K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards