We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Protecting House from fees/tax

Options
I am worried about losing my house to possible care fees/tax later in life and want to explore options to protect it. I have heard of one method where I set up a company which buys my house for a nominal amount with myself and wife and offspring as directors. The house would belong to the company and therefore "safe".

This sounds a bit complicated but does it even work?? Would there be annual costs of having a company that does essentially does nothing?

Comments

  • greenglide
    greenglide Posts: 3,301 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture Combo Breaker Hung up my suit!
    If your wife is still living in the property then there is no requirement to sell the house to fund care.

    It is just you that is considered at risk? Is there any real reason or is this just a general concern?
  • atush
    atush Posts: 18,731 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    the house will be safe for your wife and yourself as it can't be sold while one of you is alive and living there.

    As for passing it on, it is your house and your money. Which should be spent on good quality care should you or your wife need it. As care homes that the council pay 100% for are not the sort of care homes you would want to be in or would want your wife to be in.

    If you want to leave something to your children, give it to them now before you are old enough to need care.

    But most people dont go into a care home.
  • atush wrote: »
    But most people dont go into a care home.


    Should we find it comforting that we are unlikely to need care? Or worrying that we'll probably keel over before we do need care?
  • Your_Hero
    Your_Hero Posts: 883 Forumite
    edited 31 July 2014 at 6:27PM
    You do not need to worry if your spouse is still living in the home if you were to go into care, or vice versa.

    A problem may arise where the spouse living at home dies first while you are in care. Obviously you could give your home away to your children and continue to live in it (but beware this is not effective for IHT, since it is a gift with reservation, and also may be seen as deprivation of assets for care purposes).

    In cases where it is not possible or you don't want to gift the home away, you should look at changing the you own your home to "tenants in common" (as opposed to joint tenancy) if it is not already, and update your Will. This means that you each own a defined share (usually equal) of the property and upon first death does not automatically go to the surviving spouse but to anyone you wish (e.g. your children, or a trust).

    The worst case scenario would be for you to be assessed as owning only half the share in the property to pay for care fees.
    Stephen Covey once said that "when you teach once, you learn twice". That is the primary reason for my participation on the forums as an IFA.

    Although I strive to provide accurate information in my posts, there may be the odd time when I fail. Yes I know it's hard to believe but even Your Hero can make mistakes. Apologies in advance.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 350.8K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.5K Spending & Discounts
  • 243.8K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 598.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.8K Life & Family
  • 257.1K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.