We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Civil Service Pension Choices
Comments
-
-
jamesperrett wrote: »Not sure which scheme you are thinking of, but there is certainly a lump sum in the Classic scheme which is what we are talking about here.
I was referring to the comment by Boxerfan. Classic apart, existing CS pensions do not offer an automatic lumpsum. But it really does not matter as you can convert pension to lumpsum or for classic you can convert lumpsum to pension. It is just a matter of whether it makes economic sense to do so.Few people are capable of expressing with equanimity opinions which differ from the prejudices of their social environment. Most people are incapable of forming such opinions.0 -
I think the OP's dilemma was whether to stay in Classic or opt into the new 2015 scheme as the new scheme has better accrual rates over Classic for the remainder of their service. Yes you can convert to lump sum in the new scheme but that would surely reduce the annual pension element. Classic, whilst lower accrual rates has the automatic LS without reducing annual pension which was what I was trying to point out.I was referring to the comment by Boxerfan. Classic apart, existing CS pensions do not offer an automatic lumpsum. But it really does not matter as you can convert pension to lumpsum or for classic you can convert lumpsum to pension. It is just a matter of whether it makes economic sense to do so.
I certainly would never convert lump sum to pension in Classic as the rate is abysmal.0 -
BoxerfanUK wrote: »I certainly would never convert lump sum to pension in Classic as the rate is abysmal.
At age 60 and including spouse pension it's around 4.83%. That's higher than an annuity would get you with the same benefits so why is it abysmal?0 -
Don't know what it was in percentage terms Jem, and it was some time ago that I went onto the CSP calculator, but compared to the amount of pension you lost when taking extra LS the amount of pension gained by surrendering the LS 'seemed' abysmal in terms of certain choices I had within Classic at the time.
It may well be that it compares favourably with annuities in the private sector but that wasn't what I was comparing it with, either for me or the OP on this thread who is also in Classic, but I do take your point. ;-)0 -
Also, the new scheme (to be called 'Alpha') only pays dependants benefits of 37.5% of your pension, compared to 50% in Classic.jamesperrett wrote: »I hadn't noticed the lack of lump sum in the new scheme.
Given that Classic now allows for up to 45 years of contributions rather than 40, it looks like I will probably be better off staying with Classic as I will still be contributing to it up until 2 months before my 60th birthday.0 -
BoxerfanUK wrote: »Don't know what it was in percentage terms Jem, and it was some time ago that I went onto the CSP calculator, but compared to the amount of pension you lost when taking extra LS the amount of pension gained by surrendering the LS 'seemed' abysmal in terms of certain choices I had within Classic at the time.
I agree that the commutation rate for converting pension to lump sum at 12:1 is dire. Wouldn't really consider that.It may well be that it compares favourably with annuities in the private sector but that wasn't what I was comparing it with, either for me or the OP on this thread who is also in Classic, but I do take your point. ;-)
It's not a case of comparing private sector with public sector - it's comparing like with like. If you intend spending the lump sum then it's useful to have but inverse commutation would give you index-linked income with a spouse pension at a rate you would never achieve by taking the lump sum.0 -
Classic pays an automatic lump sum and pension.
Didn't know you could convert the lump sum to pension? How and when can u do this ?
Thanks0 -
Classic pays an automatic lump sum and pension.
Didn't know you could convert the lump sum to pension? How and when can u do this ?
Thanks
When you draw the pension you can ask for this option. The pensions administrator will provide a quote for what a given lump sum will buy in pension. You accept or not but once it is done it is done.
It is an option that might suit some people (eg single, healthy lots of savings, no relatives/dependents to consider).Few people are capable of expressing with equanimity opinions which differ from the prejudices of their social environment. Most people are incapable of forming such opinions.0 -
Blimey - just read through the Alpha stuff - need a lie down.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.4K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.4K Spending & Discounts
- 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.4K Life & Family
- 261.5K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards

