We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
taking someone off a three named mortgage
Options

kcishepps
Posts: 2 Newbie
hi. i currently have a mortgage with nationwide with my 2 brothers. this came about after being left the house after our mother passed. one brother now wants to come off as he wants to buy his own place and wouldnt be given a second mortgage (even though he is not contributing to this one). after speaking to many departments within nationwide, i am still none the wiser whether this can happen. some departments are saying it should be able to be done and would include a transfer of equity and others are saying they cannot do it at all as it is too complex to take a mortgage from three names down to two. could you shed any light on the situation?
0
Comments
-
It can be done theoretically.
But nationwide will need to assess the application and if acceptable then do a Transfer of equity.
Alternatively, speak to a new lender and apply in 2 names only.I am a Mortgage AdviserYou should note that this site doesn't check my status as a mortgage adviser, so you need to take my word for it. This signature is here as I follow MSE's Mortgage Adviser Code of Conduct. Any posts on here are for information and discussion purposes only and shouldn't be seen as financial advice.0 -
Are you buying your brother out of his share?0
-
No we re not buying him out0
-
I think your problem is that Nationwide aren't clear what you are trying to do so you are getting different answers.
The way mortgage lenders work, they want the "First Charge" on the property. This means that when the property is sold, or if they have to repossess it, they get their money back before anyone else does.
There are problems for the bank if your brother owns part of the house, but isn't on the mortgage. If they need to repossess it, they couldn't sell it without his agreement, and if at that point it was in negative equity then he might get his share first, and as a result they might make more loss than they would if they could make the mortgage holders bear the loss.
For these reasons, normally lenders like to get to a position where everyone who owns a property is also a party to the mortgage. To achieve this, you would have to remortgage to buy him out of his share of the equity in the property (the difference between what the property is worth and the mortgage).Fashion on the Ration
2024 - 43/66 coupons used, carry forward 23
2025 - 62/890 -
They won't let your brother off of the mortgage unless he is coming off of the ownership also.
To do so would provide them with risk they neither want nor need.
The three of you should get yourselves some advice from a Mortgage Broker on the options possible.I am a Mortgage Broker
You should note that this site doesn't check my status as a Mortgage Broker, so you need to take my word for it. This signature is here as I follow MSE's Mortgage Adviser Code of Conduct. Any posts on here are for information and discussion purposes only and shouldn't be seen as financial advice.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 350.8K Banking & Borrowing
- 253K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.5K Spending & Discounts
- 243.8K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.8K Life & Family
- 257K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards