We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Do I have to accept this or not?

2»

Comments

  • macman
    macman Posts: 53,129 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Indeed, but the OP has not used this route, which is infinitely more difficult anyway. After 15m they'd have to prove a pre-existing fault, by paying upfront for an engineer's report, with no guarantee of success.
    No free lunch, and no free laptop ;)
  • Raksha
    Raksha Posts: 4,569 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Under the SOG act, the retailer has one opportunity to repair/replace/offer refund, the retailer has used that opportunity and found out repair isn't possible.
    The OP then needs to formally reject the item to start the procedure correctly. The retailer then refunds by the same method payment was made (to avoid money laundering). If refund is made to the mail order account, the OP then needs to clarify the procedure for closing an account with a credit balance with the mail order company
    Please forgive me if my comments seem abrupt or my questions have obvious answers, I have a mental health condition which affects my ability to see things as others might.
  • unholyangel
    unholyangel Posts: 16,866 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    macman wrote: »
    Indeed, but the OP has not used this route, which is infinitely more difficult anyway. After 15m they'd have to prove a pre-existing fault, by paying upfront for an engineer's report, with no guarantee of success.

    SoGA is not something that applies depending what route you go down. If goods do not conform to contract at time of delivery (ie inherently faulty) then SoGA applies.

    Despite the burden of proof being on the consumer after 6 months, that doesnt mean that only the consumer can prove its faulty. And burden of proof would only really come into it if there was a dispute about whether the goods conformed to contract or not.
    You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means - Inigo Montoya, The Princess Bride
  • wealdroam
    wealdroam Posts: 19,180 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    macman wrote: »
    Indeed, but the OP has not used this route, which is infinitely more difficult anyway. After 15m they'd have to prove a pre-existing fault, by paying upfront for an engineer's report, with no guarantee of success.
    Oh, thought the OP had used that route, and the seller accepted the situation and offered a partial refund... as they are allowed to do under SoGA.
    The only bit the seller appears to have got wrong is that technically account credit is not a refund.

    Raksha wrote: »
    Under the SOG act, the retailer has one opportunity to repair/replace/offer refund, the retailer has used that opportunity and found out repair isn't possible.
    The OP then needs to formally reject the item to start the procedure correctly. The retailer then refunds by the same method payment was made (to avoid money laundering). If refund is made to the mail order account, the OP then needs to clarify the procedure for closing an account with a credit balance with the mail order company
    Raksha, that all sounds pretty good except the bit about 'one opportunity'.

    I don't think there is anything in SoGA that says the seller only has one chance to effect a repair, but am happy to be corrected.
    Also just to mention, rejecting goods has a specific meaning under SoGA, and in this particular case, after fifteen months, there is now no opportunity for the buyer to reject the goods.
  • unholyangel
    unholyangel Posts: 16,866 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    wealdroam wrote: »
    Oh, thought the OP had used that route, and the seller accepted the situation and offered a partial refund... as they are allowed to do under SoGA.
    The only bit the seller appears to have got wrong is that technically account credit is not a refund.



    Raksha, that all sounds pretty good except the bit about 'one opportunity'.

    I don't think there is anything in SoGA that says the seller only has one chance to effect a repair, but am happy to be corrected.
    Also just to mention, rejecting goods has a specific meaning under SoGA, and in this particular case, after fifteen months, there is now no opportunity for the buyer to reject the goods.


    I don't think its been implemented yet - but there are supposed to be changes to the SoGA under the same consumer rights bill that brought us CCRs and more (were changes in the financial industry in november last year i think that were the first bunch of changes).

    Cant remember it all but one of the changes was that the retailer has 1 attempt to repair. Other one was under SoGA, you have a standard 30 days to reject the goods under non-acceptance (was also a bit saying it would be a minimum of 30 days but havent read anything recently so not sure if that part has remained unchanged).
    You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means - Inigo Montoya, The Princess Bride
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 247K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 603.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.3K Life & Family
  • 261.1K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.