We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Delivery company negligence - public liability?
Lfc1969
Posts: 13 Forumite
Hi,
My colleague suffered some personal damage (not injury) to his belongings from a negligent delivery company parked on a public pavement. The national delivery company in question won't respond to his complaint despite evidence being shared (photos and details).
Is the correct way forwards to take this matter to the small claims court? The amount in question is around £200.
Thanks
My colleague suffered some personal damage (not injury) to his belongings from a negligent delivery company parked on a public pavement. The national delivery company in question won't respond to his complaint despite evidence being shared (photos and details).
Is the correct way forwards to take this matter to the small claims court? The amount in question is around £200.
Thanks
0
Comments
-
I suspect your friend ran into him whilst parked and thinks he's on a winner here, a bit more info is needed to determine who is negligent.0
-
Hi,
My colleague suffered some personal damage (not injury) to his belongings from a negligent delivery company parked on a public pavement. The national delivery company in question won't respond to his complaint despite evidence being shared (photos and details).
Is the correct way forwards to take this matter to the small claims court? The amount in question is around £200.
Thanks
The vehicle was parked, so what moved such that damage occurred?0 -
I suspect your friend ran into him whilst parked and thinks he's on a winner here, a bit more info is needed to determine who is negligent.
You suspect incorrectly. I'm not looking for advice as to who is negligent etc, I'm looking to establish if the correct course of action for a small sum is the small claims procedure? There was no injury, just faulty equipment which has caused damage to a colleagues personal possession..0 -
I'm looking to establish if the correct course of action for a small sum is the small claims procedure? There was no injury, just faulty equipment which has caused damage to a colleagues personal possession..
Yes, your friend can go down the small claims route, but they may well end up wasting their time and losing more money by doing this which is why bris stated a bit of info is needed.
There is no need to state the name of the delivery company, simply a brief synopsis of the facts.0 -
shaun_from_Africa wrote: »Yes, your friend can go down the small claims route, but they may well end up wasting their time and losing more money by doing this which is why bris stated a bit of info is needed.
There is no need to state the name of the delivery company, simply a brief synopsis of the facts.
Ok. The delivery company had unloaded some large metal trolley cages (six foot by six sized cages) on the pavement which had wire mesh type panels. One of the mesh panels had broken away from the frame leaving the wire sticking out which ripped my colleagues suit as he walked past and scratched his leg (he's not bothered about the scratch) but wants them to pay for the damage.0 -
Can your friend prove what happened?0
-
Sounds like your friend was negligent in where he was walkingThis is a system account and does not represent a real person. To contact the Forum Team email forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com0
-
If it makes it to court your friend is unlikely to win as he has hit a static object and unlike the council a delivery company does not have a heightened duty of care to the general public.
That said, a company may make an economics based decision that the cost of defending out weighs the cost of settling and so despite the fact the case has little merit pay up anyway.
Send a letter before action to the companies registered address giving them 21 days to settle otherwise you will issue court proceedings. Its then a choice of if you want to gamble the issuing fee in the hope they dont defend or just learn not to brush up against things.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.4K Spending & Discounts
- 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.4K Life & Family
- 261.5K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
