We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Refund from DFS
Comments
-
Has the seller refused to supply the purchased goods?
Or has the seller just advised the buyer that the purchased sofa will not fit in the buyer's house?
I have read:
but we don't know whether the customer or seller cancelled the contract, do we?
Except perhaps that the sale was subject to survey to start with.
If a contract of sale exists then the goods will not be as described. If a contract of sale doesnt exist....there is nothing legally binding on the OP to enter into a contract of sale.
Sometimes contracts/neogotiations can become frustrated without fault of either party.
There is nothing to stop the retailer suggesting/recommending another product, but trying to force the OP into accepting increased costs/reduced benefits/something that isnt as described clearly wasnt a legally binding agreement in the first place imo. All the changes are to the detriment of the customer, not the retailer.
As an aside, OP i take it they've checked window measurements etc too? Just in case the new suite would fit through the window (would involve employing a glazier but may be a better alternative so you get the suite you wanted).You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means - Inigo Montoya, The Princess Bride0 -
Hi Wendy_T
I am sorry to hear that you are having problems and that your chosen sofa would not fit.
If you would like to give us a call in head office we would be more than happy to look into this for you.
Many thanks
Lauren
DFS Head Office Customer Service
Tel: 01302 330365“Official Company Representative
I am the official company representative of DFS. MSE has given permission for me to post in response to queries about the company, so that I can help solve issues. You can see my name on the companies with permission to post list. I am not allowed to tout for business at all. If you believe I am please report it to forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com This does NOT imply any form of approval of my company or its products by MSE"0 -
That is a possibility.unholyangel wrote: »Except perhaps that the sale was subject to survey to start with.
Equally possible is that an order was placed and then DFS said "we'll check that it fits before starting manufacture".
After checking, and finding that the sofa was too big, did DFS then say "that model won't fit in your house. Would you like to cancel that order and visit the showroom to choose something else?".
A reasonable customer would probably agree to that.
If that's what happened, then it is the customer that has cancelled the contract... not the seller refusing to supply the purchased goods.
Of course neither of us know exactly what happened.0 -
That is a possibility.
Equally possible is that an order was placed and then DFS said "we'll check that it fits before starting manufacture".
After checking, and finding that the sofa was too big, did DFS then say "that model won't fit in your house. Would you like to cancel that order and visit the showroom to choose something else?".
A reasonable customer would probably agree to that.
If that's what happened, then it is the customer that has cancelled the contract... not the seller refusing to supply the purchased goods.
Of course neither of us know exactly what happened.
Even under those circumstances, the most OP would be liable for would be losses directly incurred as a result of the breach - which is negligible given they havent started to make it yet, they cannot refuse to cancel/refund.You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means - Inigo Montoya, The Princess Bride0 -
unholyangel wrote: »Even under those circumstances, the most OP would be liable for would be losses directly incurred as a result of the breach - which is negligible given they havent started to make it yet, they cannot refuse to cancel/refund.
I agree, and I supplied a link in post #7 which effectively said that.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 353.6K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.1K Spending & Discounts
- 246.7K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.2K Life & Family
- 260.8K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards