APCOA Parking Charge Notice - Birmingham Airport

GB79

Guys_Dad wrote: »

Yes.

Look, if it was me, I would do a single point based on out of time. But I am, as you know, a regular, as you are. And I guess you would do the same.

OP is not and wants off the hook. So, he doesn't want to prove a point, he wants it to go away and by including the other points, it is, indeed, belt and braces.

I see our job is to give the OPs the best chance as top priority and our "mission" as second.

Quite right.... I am being purely selfish here. Just want the begging letters to go away! Thanks to everyone for their comments.

GB79

"Reasons for the Assessor’s Determination

On 18 July 2014, the appellant was issued a parking charge notice for being
in breach of the parking terms and conditions.

It is the operator’s case that the appellant parked their vehicle outside of a
designated parking area despite signage erected at the site to prohibit this.
There is photographic evidence to support that there was adequate signage
at the site to inform motorists of the parking terms and conditions. There is also
photographic evidence which shows the appellant’s vehicle parked outside
of a designated parking area.

The appellant has made a number of submissions, however, I will only
elaborate on the one submission that I am allowing this appeal on, namely
that the parking charge amount is not a genuine pre-estimate of loss.

The burden is on the operator to prove that the parking charge is a genuine
pre-estimate of loss. Although the operator has produced a breakdown of
costs incurred, I find that duplicate costs have been included, for example,
“appeal writing” costs have been listed twice. On this occasion, I am not
satisfied that these substantially amount to a genuine pre-estimate of loss and
I am not satisfied that the operator has discharged the burden.
Accordingly, this appeal must be allowed.

Farah Ahmad
Assessor"

Thanks all !

Redx

excellent news m8

please post the PPC and the above here, for posterity

https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/4488337

its not even relevant land so they should not be obtaining RK details anyway !

suggest you now complain about that fact to the DVLA and the BPA too