We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Forgot to include a potentially significant detail in PPI complaint - should I send?
debtless
Posts: 7 Forumite
Hello,
I submitted my PPI complaint to HSBC in June, using the paperwork they sent me.
At the time of the loan, I was indeed working more than 16 hours a week, but in the complaint I did not mention that I was on a zero-hours contract -- it was quite a while ago and I only just thought of this.
I now see that my zero-hours contract would have made me ineligible for PPI -- should I send them a letter with this additional info?
Thanks!
I submitted my PPI complaint to HSBC in June, using the paperwork they sent me.
At the time of the loan, I was indeed working more than 16 hours a week, but in the complaint I did not mention that I was on a zero-hours contract -- it was quite a while ago and I only just thought of this.
I now see that my zero-hours contract would have made me ineligible for PPI -- should I send them a letter with this additional info?
Thanks!
0
Comments
-
I would wait until you get the confirmation letter from them acknowledging your complaint then give them a call.0
-
Yes, but only if you have proof that this was the case. The Bank will want to see a copy of this "zero hours" contract. You'll have to ask your employer at the time to provide this.I now see that my zero-hours contract would have made me ineligible for PPI -- should I send them a letter with this additional info?
Although they are certainly being encouraged now, just a few years ago such contracts were very rare.0 -
Moneyineptitude wrote: »
Although they are certainly being encouraged now, just a few years ago such contracts were very rare.
Zero Hour contracts have been around for a long long time and weren't rare "just a few years ago" so I don't know where you're getting your information from.0 -
Most decent firms now embracing the zero hour contracts encouraged by Mr Cameron would not have had such enthusiasm for them in the recent past.Zero Hour contracts have been around for a long long time and weren't rare "just a few years ago" so I don't know where you're getting your information from.
I stand by my comment that they were rare until recently.0 -
Moneyineptitude wrote: »Most decent firms now embracing the zero hour contracts encouraged by Mr Cameron would not have had such enthusiasm for them in the recent past.
I stand by my comment that they were rare until recently.
For the public sector yes, for the private sector no, unless of course you disagree with the Office for National Statistics who say in 2000 there were 1 million zero hour contracts and in 2013 1.4 million0 -
For the public sector yes, for the private sector no, unless of course you disagree with the Office for National Statistics who say in 2000 there were 1 million zero hour contracts and in 2013 1.4 million
Now that is interesting, certainly flies in the face of the stuff being put out by Labour that zero hour contracts are all the fault of the coalition and (implying) they started in 2010!Sam Vimes' Boots Theory of Socioeconomic Unfairness:
People are rich because they spend less money. A poor man buys $10 boots that last a season or two before he's walking in wet shoes and has to buy another pair. A rich man buys $50 boots that are made better and give him 10 years of dry feet. The poor man has spent $100 over those 10 years and still has wet feet.
0 -
They certainly didn't "start" in 2010, but they were certainly not the norm in the majority of reputable firms.Now that is interesting, certainly flies in the face of the stuff being put out by Labour that zero hour contracts are all the fault of the coalition and (implying) they started in 2010!
Without wishing to de-rail the thread still further, these contracts were formerly the sole province of companies offering casual labour.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.5K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.5K Spending & Discounts
- 247.4K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.5K Life & Family
- 261.8K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
