How to check for bank account to a persons name?

meer53

Bertrams wrote: »

This message is hidden because AJG384521 is on your ignore list.

I blocked you after the godfather comment and I have no intention of looking what you have to say, as from the limited information I have on you as a person I interpret you as a insecure person, a troll or simply a naysayer which is a form of insecurity anyways.

I can only loose emotional energy from reading your posts, so I won't.

The only insecurity i see here is yours.

DCFC79

The godfather comment was just a light hearted comment, I actually thought it was quite funny myself.

meer53

Bertrams wrote: »

I did not gave an example of how this service might work, I asked for how do such services work, explaining that I might want to do something similar.

AJG384521 assumed a service I will provide and assumed that I will charge for it. I made a point that he is assuming I will charge the people, by asking a rhetorical question "Who said anything about charging?" as I was asking for information related to a subject, not input on how to charge such service or monetize such service.

Of-course, he had to follow up by an insult, accusing me of being a criminal, when I explained him that I can monetize my observation of the fact that immigrants are being exploited and are a risk to fraud, in other ways than directly charging these people for any services.

On the second part, I find it completely appropriate to charge 10 pounds for making a trip to someones house, listening and understanding the problem a person has and then making a call for this person, with this person next to me and translating the issue this person is having to English from another language.

These services are available free of charge to people who need them, i find it appalling that you charged them and didn't direct them to someone who would help them without charging them.

Bertrams

meer53 wrote: »

The only insecurity i see here is yours.

Yeah, I come in a someone thread and start to bash the OP based on no information at all, assuming things just to get it all out. Then I write it off to "humor", look for every possible detail I possibly could to win the "argument". If the OP tries to explain things and motives rationally before turning to a more aggressive approach, then of-course he is insecure.

meer53 wrote: »

These services are available free of charge to people who need them, i find it appalling that you charged them and didn't direct them to someone who would help them without charging them.

This is so very much irrational its beyond me.

A) You have no clue on the situation, the person posted in an online forum asking for help and said he will pay to anyone to come to his house and make the call.

You finding anything appealing is your subjective opinion and you yourself stated it as such. You act on your subjective opinions (feelings?) I act on mine. I have educated mine by knowing the situation and having a clear line on ethically accepted things within the community I live in.

AJG384521

Bertrams if you can read this then give me a sign

Bertrams wrote: »

A) You have no clue on the situation, the person posted in an online forum asking for help and said he will pay to anyone to come to his house and make the call.

So rather than sending some random person off the internet some helpful advice (which is what people have tried with you, myself include), you took it as an opportunity to line your own pocket?


Nobody has said anything outrageous to you, just trying to ascertain information before we could say if you had a good idea.


The problem you listed had absolutely NOTHING to do with IDENTITY THEFT, it was a collection agency that had the wrong number.


You think you have an idea for a business but you have no idea who banks report information to?


I wish you good luck in your business and I apologise for being an insecure troll.

meer53

Bertrams wrote: »

Yeah, I come in a someone thread and start to bash the OP based on no information at all, assuming things just to get it all out. Then I write it off to "humor", look for every possible detail I possibly could to win the "argument". If the OP tries to explain things and motives rationally before turning to a more aggressive approach, then of-course he is insecure.



This is so very much irrational its beyond me.

A) You have no clue on the situation, the person posted in an online forum asking for help and said he will pay to anyone to come to his house and make the call.

You finding anything appealing is your subjective opinion and you yourself stated it as such. You act on your subjective opinions (feelings?) I act on mine. I have educated mine by knowing the situation and having a clear line on ethically accepted things within the community I live in.

I still wouldn't have charged them.

You misread my post, it's appalling, not appealing. Check your dictionary.

And you still haven't said where you feel you have been harrassed or attacked yet ?