We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Retrospective ppi

Looking for some advice/clarity please. We have recently been knocked back for ppi on rbs mortgage dating from 1997-2006. Appealed to bank & today received further knock back.
I informed the bank that I had 6 months off work in 2004 & didn't utilise ppi, as we were unclear that this was what was meant by the policy. Have been informed by the bank "it may be possible to make a retrospective claim on the PPI policy".
Does this mean we would get 3 months (I was off for 6 months but according to policy info, it appears that payment from policy would not kick in for 90 days) of the ppi premium refunded or 3 months of our mortgage payment refunded??
Also would any payments be subject to the 8% compound interest??
Finally, we were planning to appeal to FOS, so if weary to claim the retrospectve monies does this mean we would then be unable to lodge claim with FOS??

Sorry for long winded post, but feeling very confused !!!

Thanks in advance

Comments

  • dunstonh
    dunstonh Posts: 121,297 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    We have recently been knocked back for ppi on rbs mortgage dating from 1997-2006. Appealed to bank & today received further knock back.

    Not a surprise. Most mortgage insurance complaints are rejected (by bank and FOS).
    I informed the bank that I had 6 months off work in 2004 & didn't utilise ppi, as we were unclear that this was what was meant by the policy. Have been informed by
    the bank "it may be possible to make a retrospective claim on the PPI policy".

    Forgetting about cover does not mean it was mis-sold. It is often possible to put in historic claims after all these years. So, that makes sense.
    Does this mean we would get 3 months (I was off for 6 months but according to policy info, it appears that payment from policy would not kick in for 90 days) of the ppi premium refunded or 3 months of our mortgage payment refunded??

    If it was not a back to day 1 policy then you would get 3 months worth of the benefit amount.
    Also would any payments be subject to the 8% compound interest??

    It doesnt need to be.
    Finally, we were planning to appeal to FOS, so if weary to claim the retrospectve monies does this mean we would then be unable to lodge claim with FOS??

    You could complain and if the complaint was successful then the claim would either cease or if paid out before the FOS look at it, they would reduce the claim amount from redress.

    Knowing that the FOS reject most of these, what are your reasons for complaint?
    I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.
  • boys1211
    boys1211 Posts: 9 Forumite
    Thanks I think you answered a previous post I had on this.
    The reasons we felt we were mis sold because it wasn't taken into consideration our existing benefits (full & comprehensive sick pay) and that the policy wasn't fully explained to us.
  • dunstonh
    dunstonh Posts: 121,297 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    The reasons we felt we were mis sold because it wasn't taken into consideration our existing benefits (full & comprehensive sick pay) and that the policy wasn't fully explained to us.

    Whilst employer benefits works with short term debts, it tends to fail with long term major debts. The FOS have been rejecting complaints where there has been 12 months sick pay when it comes to MPPI.

    This case is real and shows how the FOS treated it. It has similarities to yours.
    http://www.ombudsman-decisions.org.uk/viewPDF.aspx?FileID=44750
    I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.
  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 26,612 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    dunstonh wrote: »

    This case is real and shows how the FOS treated it. It has similarities to yours.
    http://www.ombudsman-decisions.org.uk/viewPDF.aspx?FileID=44750
    In addition, this case went all the way to an Ombudsman (after the Bank and a FOS adjudicator had already rejected it), a process which will have taken in excess of eighteen months.

    The Op's Trust Deed further complicates matters as any redress award would surely be a pre-bankruptcy asset? No?
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.4K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 604K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.4K Life & Family
  • 261.5K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.