Extraordinarily Loyal Is The Elite

Savvybuyer

davemorton wrote: »

Your correct, I dont agree with it, but in the things we do, we have boundaries, I am not trying to enforce them, I am just trying to guide, as sometimes different people have different boundaries.
Edit: I fell that so long as there is no malice there, people should be able to discuss what they want, but unfortunately, it isnt like that.

:huh: Contradiction in terms there!

davemorton

Savvybuyer wrote: »

Oh. (Surprised.) I think the point is whether it would get through an email filter, if I decided to contact them via email.

Or maybe I've missed the point again, always that possibility:o:rotfl::rotfl::rotfl:.

Well if it gets through the forum filter, I am sure it will get through an email filter

davemorton

davemorton wrote: »

Your correct, I dont agree with it, but in the things we do, we have boundaries, I am not trying to enforce them, I am just trying to guide, as sometimes different people have different boundaries.
Edit: I fell that so long as there is no malice there, people should be able to discuss what they want, but unfortunately, it isnt like that.

Savvybuyer wrote: »

:huh: Contradiction in terms there!

Not at all. You of all people should realise that. Unless of course you are saying there are people that have no boundaries?

Savvybuyer

davemorton wrote: »

Your correct, I dont agree with it, but in the things we do, we have boundaries, I am not trying to enforce them, I am just trying to guide, as sometimes different people have different boundaries.
Edit: I fell that so long as there is no malice there, people should be able to discuss what they want, but unfortunately, it isnt like that.

Split reply, for clarity.

Again may seem blunter than it is so forgive me! You may not be trying to enforce them but that is the effect of what you're doing and it's the effect (rather than the intention) that is more important.

Arguably:rotfl:.

Regarding your additional edit, so there we have it! Finally agreeing with me on my point from several months back when I said the NT world just could not take the truth! It likes to think it can, but it does not and it is just another double-standard in that world (this world) again there. They always create an exception to a rule, and they always never follow a supposed principle to the complete and absolute letter. They always create conflicting rules that purport to exempt them in other situations.

Sorry folks, the "them" and "us", that's not a way for me to proceed is it?:cool::rotfl::rotfl:

Savvybuyer

davemorton wrote: »

Not at all. You of all people should realise that. Unless of course you are saying there are people that have no boundaries?

I suppose there are people without boundaries:rotfl:, though that deviant group of people should be ignored. I mean ignored from the equation - they cannot be ignored of course, especially as they impact the lives of others so negatively.

Sorry, as regards your "Not at all", you'll have to explain! I can't make those two parts consistent. First, you'll need to explain who you mean by "we"?

davemorton

Savvybuyer wrote: »

Split reply, for clarity.

Again may seem blunter than it is so forgive me! You may not be trying to enforce them but that is the effect of what you're doing and it's the effect (rather than the intention) that is more important.

Arguably:rotfl:.

Well for that I appologise.
For the rest of your post, I will just go ......
:grouphug:

(sorry, could not find that other hug people use, but I hope you get what I mean, I liked it)

davemorton

Savvy, post us a tune and shut up :P

Savvybuyer

davemorton wrote: »

Well if it gets through the forum filter, I am sure it will get through an email filter

I don't know. These things are so inconsistent.

Savvybuyer

davemorton wrote: »

Savvy, post us a tune and shut up :P

So the classic close-down line when you have no reply to a point:p(:rotfl::rotfl:).

Nah, ignore that!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yQQhr4UcFt0

davemorton

Savvybuyer wrote: »

I don't know. These things are so inconsistent.

You know, it is strange. You say about reading people body language, and the problems that encounters, yet on here (as in internet world) I have problems (as I think most people do) knowing exactly what people mean, yet, I think you probably have a better idea than most.

if that makes sense?

For example, I was/am unsure if I offended you earlier with my request. I dont think I did, and I hope I didnt, but you never know, well you do, I dont, but I might