We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Want to become a Forum Ambassador? Visit the Community Noticeboard for details on how to apply
Clearance items not actually 'clearance'
Comments
-
A significant amount.0
-
Money-Saving-King wrote: »A significant amount.
I'm sure you'll be able to point to one then from this year. After all, if there's a significant amount it should be easy.Money-Saving-King wrote: »a lot of people obviously make up what they think is the law instead of knowing whether it really exists or not
Or perhaps you can't read / don't understand / make up what people actually do write on here?0 -
Money-Saving-King wrote: »A significant amount.
I did a search for those very words. "trading standards act" does NOT return ANY results in at least the first couple of pages of results with those very words in sequence (I got bored looking further), other than this very thread where YOU mention it.
0 -
I think the Shell garage with the illegal signs thread had the Trading Standards Act referenced!0
-
yeah yeah whatever you are all like children. i spoke to my friend who is a very successful conservatory company, a big name in this part of the country. he has told me that the trading standards act requires the retailer to provide a "full list of payment methods in a recognised format at the point of sale". the petrol station did not provide this.
as for my mother i will call her what i want she is a lovely lady and did not deserve this treatment.
There you go!0 -
That's on a different board, not Consumer Rights.
Of course it's possible that by "on here" MSK is referring to "the internet as a whole".0 -
And also that example was a troll, quite clearly, so I'm not sure it counts.
Plus it IS the unfair trading act, but virtue that it's the act about unfair trading, it's just not The Unfair Trading Act.0 -
It should count, it went on for about 15 pages ! even though it was a Troll, they quoted it, it was on THIS website , so what Money-Saving-King has said is correct. It was also mentioned numerous times, so him saying significant amount is also correct.
Just for the pedantic ones out there ! lol0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 353.9K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.2K Spending & Discounts
- 246.9K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603.5K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.3K Life & Family
- 261K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards