We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Freehold landlord interfering in sale

Can the landlord who owns the leasing details on my flat actively interfere in the attempts I am making to sell it?

I have been informed that, following an advertisment for the sale of the property, he has directly approached the estate agent and has given his own details suggesting they should correct the advertisement to his way of thinking. This is my property, he merely owns the leasehold. This is my sale, he has no right to interfere. This is harrassment is it not?

Any help would be greatfully received, thank you.

Comments

  • silvercar
    silvercar Posts: 50,801 Ambassador
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Academoney Grad Name Dropper
    The estate agent has a contract with you not the freeholder, so shouldn't be taking instruction from the freeholder. The only problem may be if the freeholder has told the estate agent something that means the EA description is factually inaccurate and therefore the EA is obliged to modify his info. Has this happened?
    I'm a Forum Ambassador on the housing, mortgages & student money saving boards. I volunteer to help get your forum questions answered and keep the forum running smoothly. Forum Ambassadors are not moderators and don't read every post. If you spot an illegal or inappropriate post then please report it to forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com (it's not part of my role to deal with this). Any views are mine and not the official line of MoneySavingExpert.com.
  • koppite412
    koppite412 Posts: 33 Forumite
    The EA listed the property as an 'investment opportunity', which could mean anything. The freeholder complained directly to the estate agent becuase of this due to an ambiguous clause in the lease that says you cannot sublet. However, any property is an investment, particulary in a rising market, so it could be argued on that basis he should leave the EA alone to do his job.
  • silvercar
    silvercar Posts: 50,801 Ambassador
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Academoney Grad Name Dropper
    So now the estate agent is aware that the property would be unsuitable to anyone seeking a buy-to-let; at least he knows the score. You would be on to a loser if a buyer pulled out 4 weeks down the line when he found this out.

    The property could still be an investment opportunity in that it could be updated and sold on at a profit.
    I'm a Forum Ambassador on the housing, mortgages & student money saving boards. I volunteer to help get your forum questions answered and keep the forum running smoothly. Forum Ambassadors are not moderators and don't read every post. If you spot an illegal or inappropriate post then please report it to forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com (it's not part of my role to deal with this). Any views are mine and not the official line of MoneySavingExpert.com.
  • koppite412
    koppite412 Posts: 33 Forumite
    Well, the EA was aware of that from the word go, so the BTL clause is being disclosed to potential investors. Thats not really the problem because if they want to buy it like that, so be it. The problem is the freeholder's approach to the EA with what he thinks are the facts. It makes you wonder what else he could do to prevent the sale to someone else and try to get it for himself. He's made no offer or approach to buy, almost as if he's hoping the price will drop with each throw of his dice, putting him in a position to buy. Can somebody do this?
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.4K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 604K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.4K Life & Family
  • 261.5K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.