Every Loquacious Idiosyncrasy Treated Equally - 11+ ELITE Thread

JulieElizabeth

thanks LilacLillie

some of the wines in the meal deal are £7 (the Spanish rose one I got is), but are also on offer 2 for £10

so just wondering out loud how this would work for two meal deals with two of these wines

pk04

queen_of_cheap wrote: »

:rotfl: :rotfl: :rotfl: I was thinking the same *sits on hands*

Glad I wasn't the only one :rotfl::rotfl::rotfl:

Mumto2monkeys

Reeds worked on H/D this morning:jv m

0.68 x ASDA Bananas by Weight per kg £0.46 £0.46
0.33 x ASDA Carrots by Weight per kg £0.24 £0.24
1 x Air Wick Home Signature Reed Diffuser Diamonds & P... £11.98 £5.99
1 x Air Wick Reed Diffuser Signature Scent Sapphire & ... £11.98 £5.99
1 x Air Wick Reed Diffuser Signature Scent Velvet & Wh... £11.98 £5.99
1 x Warburtons Sliced Danish White Bread (400g) £0.75 £0.79

Mumto2monkeys

Anyone in B@rnsl3y the rtc tuna mentioned ....o.m.l has the sunflower oil 4 pk £2.50 on the reduced shelves at the end of the cereal aisle:)
Also lots of whoopsied Maris piper potatoes, big bag £1.. This was 1/2 an hour ago.

Arthien

bubbs wrote: »

Oh just looked really light, maybe i dont whisk mine enough:o
Saying that cause of my hand not made a cake since my frit topped xmas cake last year:eek:

Dare I ask what frit is? I don't want any of PD's 'special dictionary' links :rotfl:

Mumto2monkeys

aau1 wrote: »

Either quavers doesn't work in Scotland or the lunchtime update has screwed me

I just checked my results from this am and they compared £2v£3.65 :mad: :mad: :mad:

ETA: the classic compared at £1 at least

:eek: oh no, I've just bought them, results in an hr ish:)

Edit: just checked msl and ms and still showing £1 in t....

ilovetoshop

Mumto2monkeys wrote: »

:eek: oh no, I've just bought them, results in an hr ish:)

argh...( shocked face) I have results in 22 mins lol....hmm could be a potential disaster as would wip rest of apg out ( shocked face )


where have my faces gone,


when in A they had lots of cake decorations reduced and lots of cake mixes and honey and jam and tins of fruit all reduced maybe worth having a look if you are in store ( happy face )

aau1

Mumto2monkeys wrote: »

:eek: oh no, I've just bought them, results in an hr ish:)

Edit: just checked msl and ms and still showing £1 in t....

That's the annoying thing, they are still £1 for me...have been since the 24th

I even checked whilst in checkout queue incase it had changed

Most likely it's a Scottish thing. At least I hope it is for your sake

MKS

bubbs wrote: »

The cheek eh!:eek:
Nerfy is not me, im an :A:A:rotfl::rotfl:

Of course. You just delight in intellectual conversation.:rotfl::rotfl::rotfl::rotfl:

Savvybuyer

Sarahdol75 wrote: »

Sorry to hear this, hope she recovers soon.

Received a letter from AA this morning, my renewal is due TOMORROW, and they are taking £68 tomorrow, out my bank, how annoying. :eek: I cancelled with them last year as they were too expensive and I could get it cheaper elsewhere, but they said I am on automatic renewal yearly :mad:

Has anyone heard of Autoaid, and any problems with them????

Oh. So that's alright then. I disagree profoundly. Whether on "auto-renewal" or not, how do they have the right to take money from anyone without permission? Ring them and INSTRUCT them not to take money from you. Ring the bank and INSTRUCT them not to pay. Record both calls and tell them that you are doing so and, if they still take anything, contact the police for their theft. If any 'normal' person took money from someone without consent (which wasn't as a fine from a lawful court for example), they'd be pursued without any question. I do not see how or why anything different should apply just because they are organisations or companies. In my view the member of staff whose actions, or omissions, cause cause money to be taken should be held personally liable and locked up in prison for a long time.

It's absolute infuriating!!:mad::mad::mad: Not to mention (oops, I'm now doing so:rotfl:) the psychological stress, annoyance and fury that it causes to you (and to me vicarously now reading about it) - in my view they ought be made liable for that as well and forced to pay punitive damages:mad:. As well as being ordered to publish a profound apology, at their expense, in all UK national newspapers.

Okay - rant over.:rotfl: