Video: Why an independent Scotland would be financially better off

IveSeenTheLight

AndyGuil wrote: »

They are. So one for Yes and one for No will do. My wellies can't cope, I will need waders at this rate!

They are not, we have multiple interest rate threads alone
Let alone Halifax, Nationwide, Land Registry etc posts on house prices
These are examples of same topics, different sources threads.

danothy

IveSeenTheLight wrote: »

They are different topics.
Should there just be one thread for: -

House Prices
Interest Rates
Government Support Schemes
etc

I get the impression that the incessance with which the topic of independence is brought up is making people feel that there should be at most one, and ideally fewer than one thread about it.

IveSeenTheLight

danothy wrote: »

I get the impression that the incessance with which the topic of independence is brought up is making people feel that there should be at most one, and ideally fewer than one thread about it.

One wonders why so many people are opposed to discussing an important decision which will be made in three months time.

I personally don;t agree with being ignorant or stick my head in the sand philosophy.

I politely ask those not wishing to be involved in the discussion points to not respond to the threads and they will take there natural place on the pecking board of this forum.

If there is apathy to discuss the points, then the thread will fall off the front page.

14 posts and not one has contributed to the points raised "taxation, migration, energy policy and exports."

danothy

IveSeenTheLight wrote: »

One wonders why so many people are opposed to discussing an important decision which will be made in three months time.

It is entirely possible that there is nothing new to discus. Sometimes you just have to accept that the bus is not going where you want it to and you should stop holding up the other passengers.

IveSeenTheLight wrote: »

I personally don;t agree with being ignorant or stick my head in the sand philosophy.

The juxtaposition of what people say and what people do.

IveSeenTheLight wrote: »

I politely ask those not wishing to be involved in the discussion points to not respond to the threads and they will take there natural place on the pecking board of this forum.

This would not solve the problem of incessance with regard to the topic being brought up anew.

IveSeenTheLight wrote: »

If there is apathy to discuss the points, then the thread will fall off the front page.

Only to be replaced?

ruggedtoast

IveSeenTheLight wrote: »

One wonders why so many people are opposed to discussing an important decision which will be made in three months time.

I personally don;t agree with being ignorant or stick my head in the sand philosophy.

I politely ask those not wishing to be involved in the discussion points to not respond to the threads and they will take there natural place on the pecking board of this forum.

If there is apathy to discuss the points, then the thread will fall off the front page.

14 posts and not one has contributed to the points raised "taxation, migration, energy policy and exports."

You arent really debating anything though are you? You are mostly posting views based on data that most of the rest of us disagree with because it's either not robust, contradicted by more reliable sources, or whimsical.

Then when we highlight your shonky data you tell us we are wrong and create a new thread based on something else.

Its starting to seem a but futile.

But then I guess you can say the same things about my boomers threads and I have no intention of stopping those so knock yourself out.

Aberdeenangarse

IveSeenTheLight wrote: »

I personally don;t agree with being ignorant or stick my head in the sand philosophy.

Well it's obvious to most here that you've adopted the 'ostrich position' by spamming this board with numerous threads.

IveSeenTheLight

danothy wrote: »

It is entirely possible that there is nothing new to discus. Sometimes you just have to accept that the bus is not going where you want it to and you should stop holding up the other passengers.



The juxtaposition of what people say and what people do.



This would not solve the problem of incessance with regard to the topic being brought up anew.



Only to be replaced?

Whilst I understand the possition you are portraying, this could be replicated over a number of other topics which suffesr from a "groundhog day" syndrome.

How many threads have been started about interest rate rises for example.

Far more and far repeated than my 3 or 4 posts on Independence

IveSeenTheLight

Aberdeenangarse wrote: »

Well it's obvious to most here that you've adopted the 'ostrich position' by spamming this board with numerous threads.

Could the same be said about Interest Rate Rises or House Price Affordability or HPI.

This is a debate board guys, please feel free to debate (or not)

danothy

IveSeenTheLight wrote: »

Whilst I understand the possition you are portraying, this could be replicated over a number of other topics which suffesr from a "groundhog day" syndrome.

How many threads have been started about interest rate rises for example.

Far more and far repeated than my 3 or 4 posts on Independence

IveSeenTheLight wrote: »

Could the same be said about Interest Rate Rises or House Price Affordability or HPI.

This is a debate board guys, please feel free to debate (or not)

Other instances of incessance on this board are called out in due course. It's textbook deflection on your part to try to turn attention to them in order to try to distract from or justify your own wrong doing.

purch

The good news is that in 92 days we can stop caring !!!