We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

secured loan deed

13»

Comments

  • Clive_Woody
    Clive_Woody Posts: 5,966 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    edited 27 June 2014 at 11:20PM
    backtowall wrote: »
    i will cover the mess we are in first.The bank say we borrowd £10,000 in 1991.the dept is now £90,000+and growing

    Are you saying that you did not borrow this money?
    "We act as though comfort and luxury are the chief requirements of life, when all that we need to make us happy is something to be enthusiastic about” – Albert Einstein
  • BillJones
    BillJones Posts: 2,187 Forumite
    Are you saying that you did not borrow this money?

    He has a strange reluctance to answer this question. I suspect he's one of those fruit-loops who is Loking to nit-pick the details of the contract based on it not being written under admiralty law or somesuch.

    Either that, or he's properly mentally ill, or a troll.
  • jonesMUFCforever
    jonesMUFCforever Posts: 28,898 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    essjaytee wrote: »
    So was there one secured loan/deed or two??


    And in your OP you said you did query the forged deed 22 years ago as that is how long this dispute has been dragging on for so did you really query it way back then or not??


    your posts aren't very clear at all and you keep contradicting yourself...
    I think what has happened is - now bear with me----
    OP took out a loan or overdraft in the 1990's and a deed was signed and registered ---- OP says he paid it back --- but the original deed was never cancelled or de- registered --- which was quite common with banks in those days as if the customer wanted any secured borrowing they could rely on the original documents for any future borrowing.---OP then seems to have had more funds loaned to him but is querying whether the original security can be relied upon.


    If this is the case I suspect he will lose but what do I know??
    I will probably be dead before another 22 years when this will be sorted out by the Executors of the OP!
  • BillJones wrote: »
    He has a strange reluctance to answer this question. I suspect he's one of those fruit-loops who is Loking to nit-pick the details of the contract based on it not being written under admiralty law or somesuch.

    Either that, or he's properly mentally ill, or a troll.

    Hi Bill Jones

    It would be great if you could re-join the debate/thread titled:

    "Campaign for debt free money, stable house prices, pension still worth something..."

    Your defense of the banking sector has sparked many responses... we would be very interested to hear your reply.

    Being a rates trader yourself you will have an inside track view point that I am sure will help us all understand your defense of the bankers...
    Peace.
  • BillJones
    BillJones Posts: 2,187 Forumite

    Being a rates trader yourself you will have an inside track view point that I am sure will help us all understand your defense of the bankers...

    No real interest in "defending" anyone against what are pretty much just a group of people looking to vent anger through slurs based on ignorance, and the idea of collective punishment.

    It'd be like a doctor thinking it was worthwhile defending himself against the accusation that all doctors are like Shipman.
  • bigadaj
    bigadaj Posts: 11,531 Forumite
    Ninth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    BillJones wrote: »
    No real interest in "defending" anyone against what are pretty much just a group of people looking to vent anger through slurs based on ignorance, and the idea of collective punishment.

    It'd be like a doctor thinking it was worthwhile defending himself against the accusation that all doctors are like Shipman.

    Yes but shipman ended up in jail, also a failure to condemn as well as punish corrupt or at least incompetent behaviour doesn't reflect well on anyone.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 353.5K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.1K Spending & Discounts
  • 246.6K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 603K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.1K Life & Family
  • 260.6K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.