We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Car Insurance- 3 Speeding points

Hi everyone

My friend got 3 speeding points back in 2012. She has been with Direct line for 7 years and the insurance had been renewed annually with them. When she noticed a few days ago that she has not informed her insurance company, she rang them in order to update them.

She has not had an accident or anything however they are asking her to pay ~£200 fee "for the increase of premium for the previous years". Otherwise they would not give her the 7 years no claim discount in order for her to switch her insurance.

I am sure that if she had any accident they would have refused to pay out anything as she had not told them so why is she been asked to pay £200 for last years premium? Is there anything that she could do?

I would be grateful if you could help me out.
«13

Comments

  • gik
    gik Posts: 1,130 Forumite
    Pay what they are asking I suggest, it's not unreasonable. There's potentially a world of pain ahead if she doesn't.
  • forgotmyname
    forgotmyname Posts: 32,955 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Would she prefer they cancel the insurance and mark it down as intentionally witholding information or potential fraud?

    They cancel the policy and she declares having a policy cancelled for many years if not forever.
    Censorship Reigns Supreme in Troll City...

  • Expedia
    Expedia Posts: 5 Forumite
    edited 4 June 2014 at 2:15AM
    My question was how can they ask her to pay for last year's insurance that ended in March?

    She has already switched her insurance to another cheaper one and has already paid those fees. I just thought it was strange for her to pay towards the increased premium of her insurance for March 2012- March 2013 & March 2013- March 2014.
  • forgotmyname
    forgotmyname Posts: 32,955 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Because she failed to notify them all all the relevent facts when obtaining insurance.

    They may have charged an increased premium with the 3 points.
    Censorship Reigns Supreme in Troll City...

  • vaio
    vaio Posts: 12,287 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Expedia wrote: »
    My question was how can they ask her to pay for last year's insurance that ended in March?

    She has already switched her insurance to another cheaper one and has already paid those fees. I just thought it was strange for her to pay towards the increased premium of her insurance for March 2012- March 2013 & March 2013- March 2014.

    The argument goes that by picking up the points she is a higher risk and so it follows that during the years she didn't notify them they were covering a higher risk than they thought they were and were being paid for.

    TBH, the additional premium is due and should be paid for the full years in question. If the points were pre march 2012 then that's two years, if they were post march 2012 then it should only be one year.

    Having said that, if I was her I'd run a couple of dummy quotes just to check that the additional premium being charged is reasonable and if it's not then lodge a complaint.
  • trukdiver
    trukdiver Posts: 747 Forumite
    Expedia wrote: »

    I am sure that if she had any accident they would have refused to pay out anything as she had not told them so why is she been asked to pay £200 for last years premium? Is there anything that she could do?

    Not only that, non disclosure could have made the policy void which would mean she was driving without valid insurance. If she'd been caught by the police, she could have been in more trouble..
  • OnanTheBarbarian
    OnanTheBarbarian Posts: 1,500 Forumite
    Sixth Anniversary 1,000 Posts
    trukdiver wrote: »
    Not only that, non disclosure could have made the policy void which would mean she was driving without valid insurance. If she'd been caught by the police, she could have been in more trouble..

    Not true, the cover cannot be "void" unless the insurer has declared so. To retrospectively void a policy from the outset requires there to be a significant breach of policy terms and the police cannot just decide at the side of the road that you have no cover because you didn't declare some previous points or because you didn't inform your insurer of some tasteful mods.
  • trukdiver
    trukdiver Posts: 747 Forumite
    Not true, the cover cannot be "void" unless the insurer has declared so. To retrospectively void a policy from the outset requires there to be a significant breach of policy terms and the police cannot just decide at the side of the road that you have no cover because you didn't declare some previous points or because you didn't inform your insurer of some tasteful mods.

    I didn't say "would", I said "could". You've just said the insurer can declare it void (if they want to) - so it isn't "not true".

    Anyway, you won't be able to get away with soon - when insurance companies will be able to check licence details when you take out a policy.
  • Expedia
    Expedia Posts: 5 Forumite
    I asked them the exact same question regarding her insurance being void if anything had happened and they suggested when such incidents occur (e.g. accident) they will ask the policy holder to pay the increased premium and they would not void the insurance. They would void the insurance if the policy holder does not pay that increased premium and therefore they would not pay out.
  • kingstreet
    kingstreet Posts: 39,335 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    edited 5 June 2014 at 9:56AM
    In cases of claims and complaint where there has been unintentional/innocent non-disclosure, the FOS has deemed an insurer's requirement for an increased premium for the time inbetween to be a reasonable compromise.

    IMHO the request for a payment is reasonable here. The amount however, is open to question.
    I am a mortgage broker. You should note that this site doesn't check my status as a Mortgage Adviser, so you need to take my word for it. This signature is here as I follow MSE's Mortgage Adviser Code of Conduct. Any posts on here are for information and discussion purposes only and shouldn't be seen as financial advice. Please do not send PMs asking for one-to-one-advice, or representation.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.4K Life & Family
  • 258.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.