We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
The MSE Forum Team would like to wish you all a Merry Christmas. However, we know this time of year can be difficult for some. If you're struggling during the festive period, here's a list of organisations that might be able to help
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Has MSE helped you to save or reclaim money this year? Share your 2025 MoneySaving success stories!
96 Year Lease
cpage87
Posts: 3 Newbie
Hi All,
I just wanted to get some opinion on a 96 year lease. Ideally I'd prefer to purchase a property with 100+ years but have found a property that ticks all the boxes, though with a 96 year lease remaining. Given that I am a first time buyer who only intends to own the property for 2/3 years would anyone else see an issue with this length of lease? My main concern is on the saleability of a property with a lease of only 90-94 years. I've done a fair amount of research on the process and costs involved with extending the lease so am wondering if that would add enough value to the property to make it worth doing. The property is offered at £225,000.
I just wanted to get some opinion on a 96 year lease. Ideally I'd prefer to purchase a property with 100+ years but have found a property that ticks all the boxes, though with a 96 year lease remaining. Given that I am a first time buyer who only intends to own the property for 2/3 years would anyone else see an issue with this length of lease? My main concern is on the saleability of a property with a lease of only 90-94 years. I've done a fair amount of research on the process and costs involved with extending the lease so am wondering if that would add enough value to the property to make it worth doing. The property is offered at £225,000.
0
Comments
-
96 years is fine.
You have no real issues until it goes below 80.I am a mortgage broker. You should note that this site doesn't check my status as a Mortgage Adviser, so you need to take my word for it. This signature is here as I follow MSE's Mortgage Adviser Code of Conduct. Any posts on here are for information and discussion purposes only and shouldn't be seen as financial advice. Please do not send PMs asking for one-to-one-advice, or representation.0 -
I agree. I bought one with a new 99 year lease and had no problem selling it when it had 87 years. Did not want to let it drop below 85 years.0
-
I just bought with a 96-year lease. I intend to own it long-term so I may extend the lease at some point (while it's still cheap), but even if I was about to sell I think there are plenty of other improvements I could spend my money on that would give a better boost to the resale value.
Lenders like to see 50 years left on the lease at the time the mortgage is due to be paid off (so, 75 years at the start), and buyers like to see over 72 years because below 70 it gets more expensive to extend (and someone at some point will have to bite the bullet on that one, a bit like musical chairs) and you need to have been there for 2 years before you can apply. Or something like that, anyway. So basically if you're above 80 or thereabouts when you sell then the vast majority of buyers will be fine with it.
I was shocked originally by the lease lengths at the flats I was viewing. I'm sure when I used to live up North the leases were like 999 years and so it really was pretty much the same as owning the freehold. Most new leases these days though, I'm told, are only 99 years.0 -
Our current newbuild sites have leases of 999 years, 150 years and the shortest is 125 years.I am a mortgage broker. You should note that this site doesn't check my status as a Mortgage Adviser, so you need to take my word for it. This signature is here as I follow MSE's Mortgage Adviser Code of Conduct. Any posts on here are for information and discussion purposes only and shouldn't be seen as financial advice. Please do not send PMs asking for one-to-one-advice, or representation.0
-
Our current newbuild sites have leases of 999 years, 150 years and the shortest is 125 years.
Hope these are flats and not houses. In some parts of the country builders seem to con people by selling houses long leasehold so they can make extra money from selling on the freeholds to dubious property companies.RICHARD WEBSTER
As a retired conveyancing solicitor I believe the information given in the post to be useful assuming any properties concerned are in England/Wales but I accept no liability for it.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.9K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.9K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.7K Spending & Discounts
- 246K Work, Benefits & Business
- 602.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.8K Life & Family
- 259.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
