We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

looking for advice about ppi charge

2 years ago we went with a ppi company ismart for ppi on our mortgage they investigated and lettered us to say we had no ppi and could not do anything we then waited 2 years a received a letter from the bank re ppi we then opened a claim our selfs filling out all the form talking to the bank etc and were awarded our claim
we then received bill from ismart for 25% plus vat on this claim how can this be legal that by doing nothing they can do this please help

Comments

  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 26,612 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    we then opened a claim our selfs filling out all the form talking to the bank etc and were awarded our claim
    we then received bill from ismart for 25% plus vat on this claim how can this be legal
    Claims company contracts often contain a clause allowing them to represent you in any future PPI complaints you might make. Bypassing the company by complaining directly does not release you from the legally-binding contract you signed I'm afraid.
  • -taff
    -taff Posts: 15,414 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    You can ask them to prove you have to pay them though...
    Non me fac calcitrare tuum culi
  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 26,612 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    -taff wrote: »
    You can ask them to prove you have to pay them though...
    Yes, it goes without saying that the Op should check his contract terms and conditions,
  • magpiecottage
    magpiecottage Posts: 9,241 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    If the CMC did not do its job properly but then thinks it has a right to a share of the claim that came about independently of its (in)actions then you could complain and say that the circumstances mean that either it has no contract or that the terms in it are "unfair" in the Context of the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contract Regulations 1999.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 258.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.