We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
looking for advice about ppi charge
savyscotsman
Posts: 1 Newbie
2 years ago we went with a ppi company ismart for ppi on our mortgage they investigated and lettered us to say we had no ppi and could not do anything we then waited 2 years a received a letter from the bank re ppi we then opened a claim our selfs filling out all the form talking to the bank etc and were awarded our claim
we then received bill from ismart for 25% plus vat on this claim how can this be legal that by doing nothing they can do this please help
we then received bill from ismart for 25% plus vat on this claim how can this be legal that by doing nothing they can do this please help
0
Comments
-
Claims company contracts often contain a clause allowing them to represent you in any future PPI complaints you might make. Bypassing the company by complaining directly does not release you from the legally-binding contract you signed I'm afraid.savyscotsman wrote: »we then opened a claim our selfs filling out all the form talking to the bank etc and were awarded our claim
we then received bill from ismart for 25% plus vat on this claim how can this be legal0 -
You can ask them to prove you have to pay them though...Non me fac calcitrare tuum culi0
-
-
If the CMC did not do its job properly but then thinks it has a right to a share of the claim that came about independently of its (in)actions then you could complain and say that the circumstances mean that either it has no contract or that the terms in it are "unfair" in the Context of the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contract Regulations 1999.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 353.4K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455K Spending & Discounts
- 246.5K Work, Benefits & Business
- 602.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178K Life & Family
- 260.5K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
