IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Parking eye won cambridge case

Parking eye won hands down in cambridge today.
To bad you lot
«13456735

Comments

  • Hot_Bring
    Hot_Bring Posts: 1,596 Forumite
    Really ? I think I'll await an update from real people such as Bargepole, Prankster or KIL before believing a PPC employee.

    EDIT - It's "too" not "to" but given the poor grasp of language on PPC websites I'm not surprised you got it wrong.
    "The darkest places in hell are reserved for those who maintain their neutrality in times of moral crisis." - Dante Alighieri
  • Stroma
    Stroma Posts: 7,971 Forumite
    Uniform Washer
    Welcome Perky, if this has been lost it goes to a court of appeal where the decision will be binding on parking eye. The whole scam can be brought to its knees there
    When posting a parking issue on MSE do not reveal any information that may enable PPCs to identify you. They DO monitor the forum.
    We don't need the following to help you.
    Name, Address, PCN Number, Exact Date Of Incident, Date On Invoice, Reg Number, Vehicle Picture, The Time You Entered & Left Car Park, Or The Amount of Time You Overstayed.
    :beer: Anti Enforcement Hobbyist Member :beer:
  • hoohoo
    hoohoo Posts: 1,717 Forumite
    I can confirm tanglefoot is correct, but the full details are not yet known
    Dedicated to driving up standards in parking
  • Hot_Bring
    Hot_Bring Posts: 1,596 Forumite
    OK, fair enough, I've now had confirmation as well. Will be interesting to see why though. Thankfully POPLA is still the best route !
    "The darkest places in hell are reserved for those who maintain their neutrality in times of moral crisis." - Dante Alighieri
  • Stroma
    Stroma Posts: 7,971 Forumite
    Uniform Washer
    Yes I know mate, but the court of appeal is where it will be binding upon the parties, and it will depend whether the two parties involved want to take it further
    When posting a parking issue on MSE do not reveal any information that may enable PPCs to identify you. They DO monitor the forum.
    We don't need the following to help you.
    Name, Address, PCN Number, Exact Date Of Incident, Date On Invoice, Reg Number, Vehicle Picture, The Time You Entered & Left Car Park, Or The Amount of Time You Overstayed.
    :beer: Anti Enforcement Hobbyist Member :beer:
  • bob?_3-2
    bob?_3-2 Posts: 35 Forumite
    The suspense is killing how much longer will we have to wait.
  • Hot_Bring
    Hot_Bring Posts: 1,596 Forumite
    Hmmm .... not going to say where I got it from but apparently the charges WERE ruled as penalties but commercially justifiable. Kind of turns contract law on it's head !
    "The darkest places in hell are reserved for those who maintain their neutrality in times of moral crisis." - Dante Alighieri
  • bod1467
    bod1467 Posts: 15,214 Forumite
    Hot_Bring wrote: »
    but apparently the charges WERE ruled as penalties but commercially justifiable. Kind of turns contract law on it's head !

    What?!? How on earth could that decision be reached?
  • halibut2209
    halibut2209 Posts: 4,250 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Could be a strong appeal point
    One important thing to remember is that when you get to the end of this sentence, you'll realise it's just my sig.
  • bargepole
    bargepole Posts: 3,237 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    The 'test cases' heard at Cambridge on 22nd April (3JD05152 PE v Beavis, and 3JD05169 PE v Wardley) had the Judgment handed down today at Southend by HHJ Moloney QC.

    He has decided in favour of the Claimants, on the basis that although the parking charges can be classed as penalties, there is 'commercial necessity' for them, as without them PE would be unable to operate, and their landowner clients would not be able to manage their car parks.

    Permission to appeal this decision was granted by the Judge, on the basis that there were no authorities for commercial justification in cases involving consumers, and he has directed that any appeal is leapfrogged straight to the Court of Appeal.

    The two defendants now have 21 days to decide whether they wish to appeal. A further update will be given when available.

    I have been providing assistance, including Lay Representation at Court hearings (current score: won 57, lost 14), to defendants in parking cases for over 5 years. I have an LLB (Hons) degree, and have a Graduate Diploma in Civil Litigation from CILEx. However, any advice given on these forums by me is NOT formal legal advice, and I accept no liability for its accuracy.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.7K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.1K Life & Family
  • 257.7K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.