We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
What would you do? Pension and lump sum mix.

t0rt0ise
Posts: 4,511 Forumite


I'm due a small pension in October when I'm 60 and have to decide what mix to take of pension and lump sum.
Here are the options..
A. £3,840 a year pension
B. £3,309 a year pension plus £9,926 lump sum
C. £2,832 a year pension plus £18,869 lump sum.
I can't decide whether I'll live long enough to make option A pay. What a gamble.
So what would you do?
Here are the options..
A. £3,840 a year pension
B. £3,309 a year pension plus £9,926 lump sum
C. £2,832 a year pension plus £18,869 lump sum.
I can't decide whether I'll live long enough to make option A pay. What a gamble.
So what would you do?
0
Comments
-
Is the pension index-linked? Does it carry a widow's pension?
What would you do with the lump sum if you took it?
Update: what's your tax position?Free the dunston one next time too.0 -
Wait until 65?0
-
Do you have other cash savings? Do you need the income? Is 60 the scheme age w/o reduction? Do you have other pensions?
In general, unless you have a very good reason, it is best to take the highest pension.0 -
Pension is increased in line with price inflation so the booklet says.
I don't have a partner to widow's pension not applicable.
I'm working full time elsewhere, on a 20 grand salary so will pay 20% tax on it.
I can't see the point in waiting until 65.
I wouldn't do anything risky with the lump sum, would probably put it in an ISA with a long term to get the best rate. I don't need to spend it at least until I retire properly at age 66.0 -
Thanks for the help.
I have about 50 grand other savings in ISAs. 60 is the age without reductions for deferred members which I am. I'll have a pittance of an NHS pension, even smaller than that one, and the state pension at age 66 is all.0 -
Assuming in good health, witha low attitude to risk and no debt then normally best to take maximum pension with no lump sum.
As for the pittance of a pension, then an index limked pension of the value you're looking at would need a pension pot of aRound £100k. The average pot used to buy an annuity is around £30k for comparative purposes so it's actually worth a lot.0 -
If you don't need /have a use for the lump sum, wouldn't you be better off taking the maximum ( index linked) pension?
As you are still working and have earned income, you could regard the pension income as replacing the same amount of your salary, and pay that amount of salary into your pension thus increasing your retirement provision?
http://www.hmrc.gov.uk/incometax/relief-pension.htm
http://www.nhsbsa.nhs.uk/1289.aspxstate pension at age 66 is all.
https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/181237/single-tier-pension-fact-sheet.pdf
http://www.thisismoney.co.uk/money/pensions/article-2630415/Individual-statements-new-state-pensions-expected-summer.html0 -
I hadn't considered putting more into the NHS pension. When you look at the figures it barely seems worth it. I'll look again.
I've got the full NI contribution for the state pension but don't understand what the reduction will be for being contracted out.0 -
You don't have to put it in the NHS pension, you could put it into a DC pension instead.
But it would be worth looking at what added years in the NHS pension would cost.
As you have other capital, I would suggest the higher pension and save the income.0 -
Pension is increased in line with price inflation
That makes the pension much more valuable: index-linking until you peg out is very attractive, whether or not we get high inflation again, because it brings you max peace of mind - payment is guaranteed, and so is purchasing power.I don't have a partner so widow's pension not applicable.I'm working full time elsewhere, on a 20 grand salary so will pay 20% tax on it. I can't see the point in waiting until 65.
If they were to increase the annual amount for each year you waited, it might be a good idea because you'd not only get more per year but you'd pay less income tax (perhaps none) on it once your earnings have finished. If there were no increase then it would be wisest to take it at 60. You'd need to ask.I wouldn't do anything risky with the lump sum, would probably put it in an ISA with a long term to get the best rate.
Then taking the lump sum may not be wise because you'll probably get only 1.5-2% p.a. for the next six years instead of a bigger index-linked pension at 5.35% p.a. on the lump sum forgone. The attraction of a lump sum is if you have a clear purpose for it - to pay off a mortgage, to fly to Australia to see family, to replace an old car… whatever.Free the dunston one next time too.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.2K Spending & Discounts
- 245.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 258.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards