We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Partner sacked due to pregnancy

1235»

Comments

  • flashnazia
    flashnazia Posts: 2,168 Forumite
    patman99 wrote: »
    If the term of her employment was over 12 weeks (even by 1 day) then the Agency Worker Regulations (2011) come into play.

    Sorry, no they don't as the agency were using Swedish derogation.
    "fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, and wiser people so full of doubts." (Bertrand Russell)
  • Pete283
    Pete283 Posts: 354 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 100 Posts Combo Breaker
    flashnazia wrote: »
    Sorry, no they don't as the agency were using Swedish derogation.

    Under Swedish derogation even if an agency terminates an assignment for no bad reasoning (gross misconduct etc) then I believe the agency must continue to pay the worker up to 4 weeks after the end of assignment. Which never happened.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.4K Life & Family
  • 258.8K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.