We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Affordable housing?
Comments
-
True, but in some parts of the world people live in structures like this. Its only a concept at present. But a computer controlled printer could in theory create quite complicated and attractive designs.
If you can print the walls, you can print double walls and print the insulation inside the walls along with the electrical cables, water pipes etc.
Why would this be cheaper than mass producing using more conventional methods though?0 -
Why would this be cheaper than mass producing using more conventional methods though?
Reduced labour costs is the claim.Few people are capable of expressing with equanimity opinions which differ from the prejudices of their social environment. Most people are incapable of forming such opinions.0 -
will it slash the price of already loved houses in westminster?0
-
will it slash the price of already loved houses in westminster?
Who knows! As Bantex suggests the costs estimates of such technology needs justification. But if they are right that it will be possible to build new houses less expensively I guess it will have an effect on existing houses.
It may make some house maintenance or extension more cost-effective. For example, you want a brick wall, could 3D printing produce a structure that looks like a brick wall?Few people are capable of expressing with equanimity opinions which differ from the prejudices of their social environment. Most people are incapable of forming such opinions.0 -
Who knows! As Bantex suggests the costs estimates of such technology needs justification. But if they are right that it will be possible to build new houses less expensively I guess it will have an effect on existing houses.
It may make some house maintenance or extension more cost-effective. For example, you want a brick wall, could 3D printing produce a structure that looks like a brick wall?
the answer is NO
the price of houses in Westminster is unrelated to 3D printing costs
I seem to have read many many articles about mirage new building techniques that will slash the costs of housing; unless the 3D printer produced new land then I suspect houses prices will continue to rise.0 -
As has been said ... it's not the house itself that's the problem. There are 1000s of ways to live cheaply: cabins, mobile homes, shipping containers, flatpack houses from Ikea..... 1000s of solutions.
The problem is where is the land to put it on?0 -
Building cheap houses isn't a problem - it's where they go that's the problem.
In the 1790's Derby Town Council would only give permission for the Derby Canal to be built on the proviso that 5,000 tons of coal were made available toll free for the town's poor. i.e. they increased the cost of coal for everyone else.
Same's happening 220 odd years later. They were adamant that a new Tesco wasn't needed......until the bribe increased.0 -
3D printing is largely a fad
the idea is that the human labour input into the making of whatever 3D product will be reduced to zero. or perhaps you can define 3D printing as a manufacturing process as close to zero human labor input as possible.
well guess what? normal manufacturing is just that
a factory that builds light bulbs is for all intents a large 3D printer
a bakery is a large 3D food printer
a slaughter house is a large 3D meat printer
samsungs factories are large 3D phone printers
with regards to homes, you can already 3D print them in a factory and slot them together on site.
see for instance https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t2Tz86YBLOM0 -
3D printing is largely a fad
the idea is that the human labour input into the making of whatever 3D product will be reduced to zero. or perhaps you can define 3D printing as a manufacturing process as close to zero human labor input as possible.
well guess what? normal manufacturing is just that
a factory that builds light bulbs is for all intents a large 3D printer
a bakery is a large 3D food printer
a slaughter house is a large 3D meat printer
samsungs factories are large 3D phone printers
with regards to homes, you can already 3D print them in a factory and slot them together on site.
see for instance https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t2Tz86YBLOM
having said that i know that the real excitement or purpose of 3D printing is to supposidly bring a factory into your living room but even then it is likely to fail at most things.
the large 3D printers (ie conventional factories) will always be able to make at a lower cost vs the small 3D printers on your desk simply becuase they can buy their materials in bulk and get a far better price.
technically the 3D printers dont stand a chance vs dedicated plants but you dont even need to worry about that when you simply can conclude that the factories can sell a finished product at a price you probably couldnt buy the print material for0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 352K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.2K Spending & Discounts
- 245.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.4K Life & Family
- 258.8K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards