We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

MSE News: Energy switching times to be cut in half

Options
13»

Comments

  • pooch
    pooch Posts: 828 Forumite
    2010 wrote: »
    If the energy suppliers put as much effort and money into retaining customers as they do in trying to bamboozle them then we`d all be a lot better off.
    If they`re paying these comparison sites £60 for every switch that takes place, surely this money would be better spent keeping their existing customers by giving them the £60 to stay.

    It's not that simple.

    Over 60% of UK households have never switched supplier

    Of the less than 40% that have, they didn't all use a comparison site.

    The government wants to encourage customers to switch supplier. I'm not sure how your proposal, albeit fundamentally flawed, would help achieve this aim.
  • 2010
    2010 Posts: 5,466 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    pooch wrote: »
    The government wants to encourage customers to switch supplier.

    The government should be encouraging the suppliers to compete.
    At long, long last they have (through public backlash and the fear of Red Ed) finally referred them to the Competition Commission.
    This should have been done years ago, as the word cartel springs to mind.
    The only downside is the length of time it`s going to take but at least in the run up to the election the big six (you would think) will watch what they`re up to.
  • pooch
    pooch Posts: 828 Forumite
    2010 wrote: »
    The government should be encouraging the suppliers to compete.
    At long, long last they have (through public backlash and the fear of Red Ed) finally referred them to the Competition Commission.
    This should have been done years ago, as the word cartel springs to mind.
    The only downside is the length of time it`s going to take but at least in the run up to the election the big six (you would think) will watch what they`re up to.

    Wrong thread mate. The rant board is further down ;)
  • 2010
    2010 Posts: 5,466 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    pooch wrote: »
    Wrong thread mate. The rant board is further down ;)

    Not a rant "mate" just the truth.
  • Pincher
    Pincher Posts: 6,552 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    If the big energy companies collude and bahave like a cartel, the regulator needs proof. Maybe we need a bounty, or reward of some sort, for whistle blowers. Since they won't be able to get another job easily, the pay out will need to be substantial, but if we can fine the companies, the bounty pays for itself.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.6K Spending & Discounts
  • 244K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 598.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.9K Life & Family
  • 257.3K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.