We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Can you reduce the length of the lease?

2»

Comments

  • jayship wrote: »
    It may not be a mistake. It looks like all leaseholders decided to jointly buy the freehold from the land owner. This means that the land is collectively owned. Each owner has a 999 years lease. Basically having such a long lease is typically classified as freehold technically.


    In order to do this all flat owners would have had to agree to the purchase and hold the land in joint custody via a company.

    Thanks for your input. This would make sense actually! When I found details online of (what I believe to be!) the management company, there was a pie chart showing the majority free holder of 50%ish and then a good 20-25 individuals all owning 2%.

    I'm wondering if someone else in the building owns the 999 lease on the flat i'm looking to purchase and and then has sub-let a shorter lease to new owners? I don't know if that's possible i'm just thinking aloud really - if it is truly only a 99 year lease? Considering the EA told us that the 99 year started in 2003 whereas the longer lease was 02'
  • da_rule
    da_rule Posts: 3,618 Forumite
    Sixth Anniversary 1,000 Posts
    Have you managed to find the Freehold title for the flat/block of flats? It may list the current owner of the flat you want to buy as a freehold owner.

    You can't sublet a lease in the way you are suggesting. The current occupants could be tenants (in that they rent from the leaseholder), but you would probably know this.

    Also, like you, I have seen many 999 year leases, it makes the leases much easier to sell. When were these flats built?
  • da_rule wrote: »
    Have you managed to find the Freehold title for the flat/block of flats? It may list the current owner of the flat you want to buy as a freehold owner.

    You can't sublet a lease in the way you are suggesting. The current occupants could be tenants (in that they rent from the leaseholder), but you would probably know this.

    Also, like you, I have seen many 999 year leases, it makes the leases much easier to sell. When were these flats built?

    Ooh sorry not quite sure what you mean.. (bit slow here ;) ) do you mean finding the Freehold title from land reg? If so, yes I have that. I've had a quick look through it and no i'm pretty sure they're a leaseholder. The document isn't exactly in lay person terminology lol but i'm picking up some of it!

    Can't sublet, great! That's good to know thankyou. The current occupants are the owners.

    Flats are in a grade II listed building, which I believe was built in 1921. Unsure of the exact dates it was converted but from what I can gather.. Purchased for conversion in 1995 and all sold between 2003-2005.
  • da_rule
    da_rule Posts: 3,618 Forumite
    Sixth Anniversary 1,000 Posts
    That explains the date then, when they were sold off as flats they would have been registered individually as leasehold titles. And the registration date would have been around the time the flat was sold for the first time.

    By freehold title, I don't mean the leasehold title. If you imagine that the flat is leasehold, this lease is granted by a freeholder. The freeholder owns the land as a whole. There are two titles, one leasehold title for your flat and one freehold title for the land as a whole.

    Also, ask the seller if they own any of the freehold title, and if so are they selling that too.
  • da_rule wrote: »
    That explains the date then, when they were sold off as flats they would have been registered individually as leasehold titles. And the registration date would have been around the time the flat was sold for the first time.

    By freehold title, I don't mean the leasehold title. If you imagine that the flat is leasehold, this lease is granted by a freeholder. The freeholder owns the land as a whole. There are two titles, one leasehold title for your flat and one freehold title for the land as a whole.

    Also, ask the seller if they own any of the freehold title, and if so are they selling that too.

    Got cha, thanks :D Ok i'll ask the EA to ask the sellers about that on Monday. I thought if they did that it would of just been included in the purchase price. Can a share of the FH be expensive to buy?
  • da_rule
    da_rule Posts: 3,618 Forumite
    Sixth Anniversary 1,000 Posts
    Got cha, thanks :D Ok i'll ask the EA to ask the sellers about that on Monday. I thought if they did that it would of just been included in the purchase price. Can a share of the FH be expensive to buy?

    Unfortunately as with most things it depends. Specifically on things like, the percentage owned, the value of the freehold estate etc.

    If they do own any of the freehold it is unlikely they would want to retain it, but it's always worth checking.

    It would also be worth checking whether there is ground rent and how much it is, this is usually a 'pepper corn' (which is a legal term meaning very little/minimal). Also, if there is then check when the amount is up for renewal.

    And also check whether there is a management company and how much this costs per month/year.
  • da_rule wrote: »
    Unfortunately as with most things it depends. Specifically on things like, the percentage owned, the value of the freehold estate etc.

    If they do own any of the freehold it is unlikely they would want to retain it, but it's always worth checking.

    It would also be worth checking whether there is ground rent and how much it is, this is usually a 'pepper corn' (which is a legal term meaning very little/minimal). Also, if there is then check when the amount is up for renewal.

    And also check whether there is a management company and how much this costs per month/year.

    Right ok, have made a note and have added the freehold questions to my to-ask list!

    There is a ground rent, it's not peppercorn, and I have requested all that info in writing aswell as recent increases & increases in the future. Have also asked about the management company and whether or not there's a sinking fund etc.

    EA forgot to mention it was Grade II listed and had to find out for myself :/ so I have recently bombarded him with questions which he didn't seem too happy about and I have a load more now aswell. I'm a FTB and I'd rather know all the facts (or as much as poss) before potentially wasting money on legal fees. So the advice i'm receiving here i'm very grateful for!
  • da_rule
    da_rule Posts: 3,618 Forumite
    Sixth Anniversary 1,000 Posts
    I think saying the EA forgot to mention it might be being a bit generous :p
  • Land_Registry
    Land_Registry Posts: 6,323 Organisation Representative
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    You could apply to us for an official copy of the lease itself using our form OC2


    To complete the form you need
    • details of the land or property you are interested in
    • the title number (from the register)
    • your own details into the applicant fields
    • description and date of the document
    Please send the form with a cheque for £7 to our Wales office
    Official Company Representative
    I am the official company representative of Land Registry. MSE has given permission for me to post in response to queries about the company, so that I can help solve issues. You can see my name on the companies with permission to post list. I am not allowed to tout for business at all. If you believe I am please report it to forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com This does NOT imply any form of approval of my company or its products by MSE"
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.6K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.5K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.5K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 604.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.6K Life & Family
  • 261.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.