We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
The MSE Forum Team would like to wish you all a Merry Christmas. However, we know this time of year can be difficult for some. If you're struggling during the festive period, here's a list of organisations that might be able to help
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Has MSE helped you to save or reclaim money this year? Share your 2025 MoneySaving success stories!
DWP Cohabitation Interview (Upcoming)
Comments
-
Like the judge said in R V Zorlu... It's an imprecise concept0
-
I had a successful fraud case prosecution where the couple argued they were not a couple because they slept in separate bedrooms as their religion forbade sex before marriage and they were saving up for their wedding. One of them was unemployed and claimed benefit - they were very upset about being prosecuted.These are my own views and you should seek advice from your local Benefits Department or CAB.0
-
Housing_Benefit_Officer wrote: »I had a successful fraud case prosecution where the couple argued they were not a couple because they slept in separate bedrooms as their religion forbade sex before marriage and they were saving up for their wedding. One of them was unemployed and claimed benefit - they were very upset about being prosecuted.
I would have said it was obvious this WAS a couple - the mention of saving for a wedding would give the lie to not being a couple. Sleeping in a separate bedroom doesn't necessarily mean you're not part of a couple. I know people who do this because one partner snores! I believe the Queen has a separate bedroom?
It's difficult when it's a 'lodger' situation though, which is how this thread started.[FONT=Times New Roman, serif]Æ[/FONT]r ic wisdom funde, [FONT=Times New Roman, serif]æ[/FONT]r wear[FONT=Times New Roman, serif]ð[/FONT] ic eald.
Before I found wisdom, I became old.0 -
Looking at what you have said the following things would persuade the Decision Maker towards finding you and your lodger living together a) the length of the time you have been living in the same property b) £35 per week for board and lodge is nowhere near what can be regarded as a commercial arrangement c) you and your "lodger" have moved properties together three times d) your partner moved the lodger in, she left and the lodger stayed e) you don't say specifically but if you cook meals and eat together, watch TV together, go shopping together etc, these would all point to a living together relationship. The fact that you don't share the same bedroom is only a one of the signposts and as a lot of married couples have separate bedrooms it cannot be a huge factor. Basically the DM will decide whether based on the information you supply whether based on a balance of probabilities you are living together.
I assume from what you say the interviewing officer is coming to your house, there should be no reason why you should show them around your house, they should only ask you the questions of the form they need to complete, this information will then be referred to a. Decision Maker to decide from the information you have supplied whether they regard you as living together. By the way your ages will not really be part of the considerative process.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.9K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.9K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.7K Spending & Discounts
- 246K Work, Benefits & Business
- 602.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.8K Life & Family
- 259.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
