Thoughts on the following solar panels quote

nigelpm

Black20VT wrote: »

Always open for recommendations! Fire away!

PM me off board - don't know what the etiquette is here around potential advertising.

zeupater

Martyn1981 wrote: »

Hiya Z, I followed this until you said 700kWh/year. Shouldn't that be per month? In which case it starts to look a bit more normal in the 8,000kWh+ range per year. ....

Hi

Well spotted, that's what you get when you completely lose concentration in the middle of composing a post .... I'll blame it on MrsZ ....

I have absolutely no idea of what "£700kWh/year" is ... probably a completely new concept to both economists and engineers alike, but that's where everything fell apart, so that would coincide with the end of the C4 news, so I'd probably be ranting on about either reporting bias or mistakes which tends to be the case of late ....

Anyway, to avoid further confusion (including mine ), I've corrected the error with as few changes (green highlight) as possible ...

Ta!
Z

Martyn1981

zeupater wrote: »

Hi

Well spotted, that's what you get when you completely lose concentration in the middle of composing a post .... I'll blame it on MrsZ ....

I have absolutely no idea of what "£700kWh/year" is ... probably a completely new concept to both economists and engineers alike,

Ta!
Z

Hiya Zeup, I was kind and ignored the £ typo. But could you and Eric do me a favour and not throw in these small occasional maths errors - rather than accept an error, I spend ages re-reading and re-reading assuming it must be me, or a test!

Mart.

PS Nothing wrong with ranting at the telly, it's just a sign of ...... what shall we call it ...... maturity. M.