Enjoying Life's Indulgences Together Everyday

zippydooda

Savvybuyer wrote: »

Who says it is RF? May have been forum team?

They (whoever) are usually pretty inconsistent though - often I notice an original post has been deleted and yet one later that quotes or refers to it hasn't:rotfl: (or they delete one that quoted and, yet, not another that follows farther on). (Or they delete one on one basis and yet not another, later on, that appears to fall foul of the same basis for deletion. Or - :eek: they move posts to other boards and then quote a rule for the reason why, yet the post, whilst it now complies with one part of that rule, still appears not to fulfil all two other requirements of the rule. They must have seen the post as it has been moved and then they say 'because of this rule' and link to it. Yes, but the post still does not comply with that rule, on two further counts!) I will add no more, lest I get into trouble:rotfl:.

short version savvy please.

it was r soles posts deleted.:)

hornetgirl

Final reminder to do your clocks before you go to bed.

http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Kd_0XTN8pEs

aau1

zippydooda wrote: »

ive pmed her my findings or did you? arnt we the same person. so you should know.
then why the grrrrrrr as its you your talking toooo

ref R SOLES what an a.h. gutless springs to mind.

The last couple of pages had posts about sending items between two users. As soon as i saw them i thought it was going to throw a spanner in the works

Didn 't you know that?

Sunshinemummy

Savvybuyer wrote: »

:rotfl:

I'm laughing looking at my roll-arounds now.

:rotfl::rotfl::rotfl:

SSM, you do manage to make me laugh!:rotfl::rotfl::T

So pleased to give someone pleasure x

Savvybuyer wrote: »

Who says it is RF? May have been forum team?

They (whoever) are usually pretty inconsistent though - often I notice an original post has been deleted and yet one later that quotes or refers to it hasn't:rotfl: (or they delete one that quoted and, yet, not another that follows farther on). (Or they delete one on one basis and yet not another, later on, that appears to fall foul of the same basis for deletion. Or - :eek: they move posts to other boards and then quote a rule for the reason why, yet the post, whilst it now complies with one part of that rule, still appears not to fulfil all two other requirements of the rule that's been linked to. They must have seen the post as it has been moved and then they say 'because of this rule' and link to it. Yes, but the post still does not comply with that rule, on two further counts!) I will add no more, lest I get into trouble:rotfl:. I've been overlooking it as it gives useful information and the site would be much the poorer if the rule was enforced to the full strict technicality of what it says (or maybe they've not noticed what the rule, usually one they themselves wrote, actually says - that's a common one, people write things and it doesn't occur to them what they've actually said means something different to what they meant:rotfl: Not me of course:rotfl::rotfl:!).

zippydooda wrote: »

short version savvy please.

it was r soles posts deleted.:)

By it is confusing! Now I am wondering how come I do not remember r soles.... then again I think I know a few people who maybe going under a sudo name!

:D:D:D

Tinyshoes

lookinforabargain wrote: »

I'm feeling random this evening

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vbg7YoXiKn0

Not sure what you will think about this one.

Saw them quite a few times live.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RiKVjS3gR88

lookinforabargain

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qpJ0cyXbMbI

This song has so many memories for me!
Reminds me of nights out back home and a local duo who used to play and they always started with this

zippydooda

aau1 wrote: »

The last couple of pages had posts about sending items between two users. As soon as i saw them i thought it was going to throw a spanner in the works

Didn 't you know that?

did not see it. was at work. I only seen rf post 10000. I don't know how you phone posters have patience to post. especially iphone, when typing takes such a delayed action.

simone10

Was just looking for a potential glitch.
I can't see 3 products on MSM which according to Sada website are in the 3 for £6 offer. These being Nivea Oil Free Moisturising Day Cream, Johnsons Hydrating 24hr Day Cream and Johnsons Nourishing 24hr Day Cream. All are 50ml.
So if purchased with 2 of the Nivea products which are £1.99 or £1.74 versus Tosco would be a little APG return if the multibuy wasn't seen?
Can anyone else see the 3 'missing' products on MSM
https://www.dropbox.com/s/g12yaatawqtxhie/3%20for%20%C2%A36%20glitch%20checking%20290314.JPG

I'm off for some shut eye now, but I'll give it a try tomorrow but won't have access to post results until after shops close (in England)

Savvybuyer

zippydooda wrote: »

short version savvy please.

it was [] posts deleted.:)

Ah:doh:.

S10CT:rotfl::rotfl:.

Sunshinemummy

I think, a film, a cuddle and bed is the order of the day.

Night all

xxxx