We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

House title

2»

Comments

  • antrobus
    antrobus Posts: 17,386 Forumite
    madbadrob wrote: »
    Firstly the property now automatically passes to the wife of the deceased and as such the decision as what to do with the property now is up to her.....

    Ooops wrong.
    !!!!!! wrote: »
    You first need to clarify whose name(s) the house is in and whether it is joint tenants or tenants in common.....

    Correct answer.
    !!!!!! wrote: »
    ...If the OP is still joint tenant with the ex then the new wife does not get a look in and it automatically goes to the OP

    At the mention of divorce and the former marital home one should (of course) establish what was said in the consent decree about the property.
  • Crabapple
    Crabapple Posts: 1,573 Forumite
    So basically the Estate is insolvent and the house is in negative equity?

    In a normal situation the wife would be taking out a Grant and dealing with assets, and receiving them up to a certain limit, but she doesn't want to get involved according to the op.

    Generally on here the advice is not to get involved in administering an insolvent estate. However, if the wife does not want to take out a Grant (and someone would need to sign the house over) you could do so on behalf of your minor child who would be the next person entitled under intestacy.

    I would definitely take some legal advice on your position before getting involved in that situation, even if you are convinced that the debts are all going to be written off. You still would have a house with £25k more debt against it than worth and by the sounds of it a lot of work to be done as well. Regardless of your personal reasons for wanting the property, financially this does not appear to make any sense.
    :heartpuls Daughter born January 2012 :heartpuls Son born February 2014 :heartpuls

    Slimming World ~ trying to get back on the wagon...
  • wanting_an_easy_life
    wanting_an_easy_life Posts: 70 Forumite
    edited 25 March 2014 at 9:30AM
    House title
  • madbadrob
    madbadrob Posts: 1,490 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    !!!!!! wrote: »
    You first need to clarify whose name(s) the house is in and whether it is joint tenants or tenants in common.

    If the OP is still joint tenant with the ex then the new wife does not get a look in and it automatically goes to the OP

    No it doesnt. It goes in trust for the children of the deceased

    Rob
  • getmore4less
    getmore4less Posts: 46,882 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper I've helped Parliament
    edited 24 March 2014 at 9:36PM
    !!!!!! wrote: »
    You first need to clarify whose name(s) the house is in and whether it is joint tenants or tenants in common.

    If the OP is still joint tenant with the ex then the new wife does not get a look in and it automatically goes to the OP
    madbadrob wrote: »
    No it doesnt. It goes in trust for the children of the deceased

    Rob

    Survivorship through a joint tenancy trumps the intestate order or a will as the asset is 100% owned by the joint tenants(s) and is not available to be inherited by anyone.

    Issue is there is no property as there is secured debt that exceeds the value that trumps everything.
  • wanting_an_easy_life
    wanting_an_easy_life Posts: 70 Forumite
    edited 25 March 2014 at 9:30AM
    House title
  • madbadrob
    madbadrob Posts: 1,490 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Firstly y apologies with my replies. Having read them back I do not know what I was saying :( Mental note to self to check what I have typed before posting. As the OP as now edited her posts I cant respond how I would have liked but I do think she said in her original post that the ex owned the house and mortgage and as he had custody of the child he had been given the house. My post re checking the Land registry linked with the fact the house passed to the spouse was based on the OP's first message and the fact he could have attached the second wife's name as TIC or even JT. Hopefully that clears up the misleading posts I had made

    Rob
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.4K Life & Family
  • 258.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.