We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Vanguard, is iWeb the cheapest?

Hey folks, I'm SO poor with math, but hoping you guys can verify my findings... I'm looking to slowly move away from HL due to the charging structure, I have over £20K with them so it makes sense to find a cheaper alternative. The cheapest I can find is iWeb.

iWeb has a £25 opening charge and a £5 fund buying fee. Include the .33% AMC, and on £30000 that's £129.00 a year.

Interactive Investor has a £80PA account charge. £0 fund buying fee. Include the .29% AMC, and on £30000 that's £167.00 a year.

HL has a .16 initial setup charge and a .45% account charge. Include the .33% AMC, and on £30000 that's £282.00 a year.

Am I right? Thanks in advance!
«1

Comments

  • TCA
    TCA Posts: 1,626 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    The AMC/TER for Vanguard LifeStrategy products was revised down from 0.33% to 0.29% across the whole range. 0.16% is the dilution levy for LifeStrategy 100% and you will be charged that and the 0.29% AMC/TER regardless of which platform you choose, so you can largely ignore these and look at platform charges only. Try here:

    http://monevator.com/compare-uk-cheapest-online-brokers/

    FWIW, I intend to use iWeb for LS100 in the future, but that's not to say their charging won't change. You should also check their product range in case your investment choice is likely to change too.
  • bertpalmer
    bertpalmer Posts: 109 Forumite
    Seventh Anniversary 10 Posts Combo Breaker
    Thanks TCA - .33% is still showing on the HL and iWeb...?

    The other platforms don't mention a TER of .16% - surely they would if they are charging it?
  • Glen_Clark
    Glen_Clark Posts: 4,397 Forumite
    bertpalmer wrote: »
    Hey folks, I'm SO poor with math, but hoping you guys can verify my findings... I'm looking to slowly move away from HL due to the charging structure, I have over £20K with them so it makes sense to find a cheaper alternative. The cheapest I can find is iWeb.

    iWeb has a £25 opening charge and a £5 fund buying fee. Include the .33% AMC, and on £30000 that's £129.00 a year.

    Interactive Investor has a £80PA account charge. £0 fund buying fee. Include the .29% AMC, and on £30000 that's £167.00 a year.

    HL has a .16 initial setup charge and a .45% account charge. Include the .33% AMC, and on £30000 that's £282.00 a year.

    Am I right? Thanks in advance!

    I suggest you ignore AMC and look at TER - Total Expense Ratio.
    If they don't quote TER then go elsewhere because they are hiding some of their charges!!
    Have you considered Vanguard ETF's ?
    Total Expense Ratio as low as 0.09% (VUSA)
    No holding charges in most platforms - including HL
    Buying/Selling charges as low as £5.95 (X-O)
    “It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends on his not understanding it.” --Upton Sinclair
  • TCA
    TCA Posts: 1,626 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    bertpalmer wrote: »
    Thanks TCA - .33% is still showing on the HL and iWeb...?

    The other platforms don't mention a TER of .16% - surely they would if they are charging it?

    They're both in need of updating. Go to the LS100 page in the iWeb/Halifax funds library and click the KIID

    http://halifaxiweb.digitallook.com/cgi-bin/digital/security.cgi?username=&ac=&id=2569238

    Or go straight there: http://halifaxiweb.digitallook.com/get_kiid?mex_code=VVLSRU&local_code=B41XG30

    The 0.16% dilution levy is sometimes not communicated clearly on some platforms but it exists.
  • boglehead
    boglehead Posts: 168 Forumite
    bertpalmer wrote: »
    Hey folks, I'm SO poor with math, but hoping you guys can verify my findings... I'm looking to slowly move away from HL due to the charging structure, I have over £20K with them so it makes sense to find a cheaper alternative. The cheapest I can find is iWeb.

    iWeb has a £25 opening charge and a £5 fund buying fee. Include the .33% AMC, and on £30000 that's £129.00 a year.

    Interactive Investor has a £80PA account charge. £0 fund buying fee. Include the .29% AMC, and on £30000 that's £167.00 a year.

    HL has a .16 initial setup charge and a .45% account charge. Include the .33% AMC, and on £30000 that's £282.00 a year.

    Am I right? Thanks in advance!

    I like iweb, but their platform really isnt great. Youinvest is slightly better and offer regular monthly savings on a wide selection of stocks and etf ( including vanguard). That means £1.5 per transaction and no platform fee (while funds on iweb or youinvest have charges)

    Worth considering
    Total Debt
    12/2012 - £893k (mortgage and toys loans)
    11/2019 - £556k (mortgage only)
  • boglehead
    boglehead Posts: 168 Forumite
    Glen_Clark wrote: »
    I suggest you ignore AMC and look at TER - Total Expense Ratio.
    If they don't quote TER then go elsewhere because they are hiding some of their charges!!
    Have you considered Vanguard ETF's ?
    Total Expense Ratio as low as 0.09% (VUSA)
    No holding charges in most platforms - including HL
    Buying/Selling charges as low as £5.95 (X-O)

    Unless u want to replicate the sp500 only, id go wider index with vwrl... slightly more exp (0.25%) but more diversified and also has EM stocks inc'd
    Total Debt
    12/2012 - £893k (mortgage and toys loans)
    11/2019 - £556k (mortgage only)
  • Glen_Clark
    Glen_Clark Posts: 4,397 Forumite
    boglehead wrote: »
    Unless u want to replicate the sp500 only, id go wider index with vwrl... slightly more exp (0.25%) but more diversified and also has EM stocks inc'd

    Yes I have both with more in VWRL.:beer:
    “It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends on his not understanding it.” --Upton Sinclair
  • yatinsardana
    yatinsardana Posts: 133 Forumite
    edited 21 March 2014 at 9:21AM
    What's the difference between VWRL and VLS80 or VLS100?

    They both seem to be tracking global equity. VWRL has total TER of .25% whereas VLS has 0.33 and a 0.16 entry.

    VWRL seems to be quite heavily weighted towards US market (48% holdings) vs VLS which is taking a more balanced approach. Do you think it's worth holding this ETF rather than the fund to escape the higher TER
  • boglehead
    boglehead Posts: 168 Forumite
    What's the difference between VWRL and VLS80 or VLS100?

    They both seem to be tracking global equity. VWRL has total TER of .25% whereas VLS has 0.33 and a 0.16 entry.

    VWRL seems to be quite heavily weighted towards US market (48% holdings) vs VLS which is taking a more balanced approach. Do you think it's worth holding this ETF rather than the fund to escape the higher TER

    VWRL is perfectly weighted to the world market cap. The US weights seems big, because in actual terms, the US market cap represents 48% of the total world market cap (equity market only).

    I usually prefer ETF, as they are cheaper than funds - assuming you meet the minimum trading amount based on your trading fee. I pay £1.5 per trade with my broker... so as long as I invest 1.5/0.45% £333 each time, a fund doesn't make sense (based on avg funds platform charge)

    ETF are then free to maintain - no platform fee whatsoever.

    Here is 100% of my portfolio (both ISA and taxable account)

    80% vwrl (world equities) 0.25% ter
    10% slxx (corp bonds) 0.20% ter
    10% vgov (gov bonds) 0.12% ter

    These are the cheapest ETF for my investment profile, with the smallest bid/ask spread.
    Total Debt
    12/2012 - £893k (mortgage and toys loans)
    11/2019 - £556k (mortgage only)
  • patgarrett
    patgarrett Posts: 27 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Hi,
    Just looking for some advice on fees. I recently invested 75k in a HSBC American Index Class C - Accumulation fund (SP500 tracker). For some reason I misread the fee structure for this fund - I thought the TER was 0.1% when actually because the fund involves clean share classes the fee is closer to 0.4%, which doesn't seem good value for this particular tracker.
    I've read that the ETF VUSA is a better option. Can anyone provide any advice on who I should buy this with? On another thread someone mentioned that x-o.co.uk has a TER of 0.09%. Is this the best offer out there?
    Thanks for any suggestions.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 601.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 259.2K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.