We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Receiving an unexpected payment

2»

Comments

  • chanz4
    chanz4 Posts: 11,057 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Xmas Saver!
    Don't put your trust into an Experian score - it is not a number any bank will ever use & it is generally a waste of money to purchase it. They are also selling you insurance you dont need.
  • jackjones01
    jackjones01 Posts: 553 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 100 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    matttye wrote: »
    This isn't dishonestly retaining a wrongful credit, it's theft. It sounds like it should be the former, but it's not, because s24A(2A) of the Theft Act 1968 states: -

    '[F2(2A)A credit to an account is wrongful to the extent that it derives from—

    (a)theft;

    (b)blackmail;

    (c)fraud (contrary to section 1 of the Fraud Act 2006); or

    (d)stolen goods.]'

    And s24A(1) states:

    '(1)A person is guilty of an offence if—

    (a)a wrongful credit has been made to an account kept by him or in respect of which he has any right or interest;

    (b)he knows or believes that the credit is wrongful; and

    (c)he dishonestly fails to take such steps as are reasonable in the circumstances to secure that the credit is cancelled.'

    The hypothetical situation the OP refers to is that the credit randomly appears, I.e. The recipient is not expecting the money. It is therefore impossible for the recipient to know or believe that the credit derives from theft/blackmail/fraud/stolen goods and they are therefore not guilty of that offence.

    It's plain ol' theft.

    So why? was this woman not charged with theft then? It looks as if she was only charged with "dishonesty and retaining a wrongly-credited bank transfer"

    http://www.birminghammail.co.uk/news/midlands-news/womans-9000-spending-spree-bullring-6908056
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.8K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.9K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.7K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.9K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 602K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.8K Life & Family
  • 259.8K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.