We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Rightmove March +1.6% MoM +6.8% YoY
Comments
-
mayonnaise wrote: »I can imagine many will opt to pick up a BTL or two instead of signing up for a meagre annuity.0
-
a BTL offers...growth in capital as more and more retirees buy into the market....rent as income....and instant access to cash(selling up)...i struggle to see how an annuity can compete??mfw'11 No68- 55k mortgage İO--little to nothing saved! i must do better.0
-
I can't see hoardes of people getting into BTL on the strength of the pension changes. Withdrawing cash from a pension and paying the marginal rate of tax seems quite an inefficient investment.
I'm not a BTL but I always get the impression that most are looking to get out rather than buying in at retirement.0 -
I can't see hoardes of people getting into BTL on the strength of the pension changes. Withdrawing cash from a pension and paying the marginal rate of tax seems quite an inefficient investment.
In many cases it will be inefficient indeed.
In many others, it might not be that clear cut?
Imagine a basic rate payer coming to retirement at 65 with a modest pension pot of about ~200K. I'm not that clued up on annuities, but I imagine it would be a stretch to get an annuity of 1K per month out of it.
Or take the hit and cash in 170K.
A flat of that price around here would fetch close to 1K rent also.
Most importantly, there would be an asset to pass on.
I also believe there will be a psychological effect of "having the cash now", even if it would make more financial sense not to withdraw it all.Don't blame me, I voted Remain.0 -
mayonnaise wrote: »In many cases it will be inefficient indeed.
In many others, it might not be that clear cut?
Imagine a basic rate payer coming to retirement at 65 with a modest pension pot of about ~200K. I'm not that clued up on annuities, but I imagine it would be a stretch to get an annuity of 1K per month out of it.
Or take the hit and cash in 170K.
A flat of that price around here would fetch close to 1K rent also.
Most importantly, there would be an asset to pass on.
I also believe there will be a psychological effect of "having the cash now", even if it would make more financial sense not to withdraw it all.
The alternative to buying an annuity (or withdrawing all of the money to invest in BTL) would be to invest in exactly the same corporate bonds and government gilts that the annuity company would have invested your pension into (and perhaps put a little into equities for a potentially higher return) and enjoy the benefit of a steady income but still have access to the money for inheritance, etc.
As I approach retirement age I'll be gradually moving out of equities and into bonds/gilts anyway, to protect me from any stockmarket downturns. My pension pot will already be in 'annuity mode' and so instead of having my returns re-invested as I do currently, I could simply take them as an income.0 -
...if there wasn't going to be a mass exodus why did all the insurers drop on the news.....a tax hit on withdrawing will be more than be paid back by growth in capital growth on a property....an annuity will never grow once taken...property will be seen as a safe haven away from all the financial crooks.....like banks!mfw'11 No68- 55k mortgage İO--little to nothing saved! i must do better.0
-
An annuity isn't something you can pass on in your will so property investment is the obvious choice. You get cash every month and have an asset that increases in value.0
-
to me it is such a no brainer....i just can't see the appeal of property being out shone by an equity with its meager fixed returns and as you say it can't be passed on to the family!!....if pensioners dont want to be landlords they will install their kids in properties (with rent income)!mfw'11 No68- 55k mortgage İO--little to nothing saved! i must do better.0
-
From reading your post I asked an estate agent to look at my properties and got a very present surprise from their valuations.
I'm no debating with myself to stick or twist.
Come on Chunks we all know the only property you've got is a Timeshare in Majorca.As for debating with yourself, that could make you go blind!:eek:0 -
Aberdeenangarse wrote: »Come on Chunks we all know the only property you've got is a Timeshare in Majorca.As for debating with yourself, that could make you go blind!:eek:0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.2K Spending & Discounts
- 245.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.4K Life & Family
- 258.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards