We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Could you rate this portfolio?

2»

Comments

  • ColdIron
    ColdIron Posts: 10,144 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Hung up my suit! Name Dropper
    Catapult, your portfolio is getting a bit of a pasting but I think you knew that it would. I'm not sure I would be so courageous to post mine to public scrutiny

    Here's a question for you

    Would you be happy with the same choices in 10 years time?
  • Catapult
    Catapult Posts: 47 Forumite
    Tenth Anniversary 10 Posts Combo Breaker
    ColdIron wrote: »
    Here's a question for you

    Would you be happy with the same choices in 10 years time?

    Momentum and other research will likely mean rebalancing / amending fund selections to try and maximise return. So the choices will probably look different in 10 years time. Will need to include exposure to EM and Asia in due course and yet to include USA, so portfolio will probably evolve over 10 years.
  • planteria
    planteria Posts: 5,322 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Linton wrote: »
    Agree with Azza. You only need one fund per sector if you are investing 8X£5K and should have a much broader range of sectors. Also agree with the queries on Acc and Inc funds.

    Your choice of funds seems perverse with frequent use of the more obscure fund managers. There are better known funds in their respective sectors than those offered by Ignis, Pictet, Premier, River & Mercantile.

    Going for an Ethical fund as 1 out of 8 seems most odd. If you believe in Ethical funds you surely would want to go 100% that way and probably suffer a lower return. If you dont believe in them dont use them.

    i'm not sure that 'better known' is something that we ought to push towards.
  • planteria
    planteria Posts: 5,322 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    jimjames wrote: »
    Agreed, it does seem strange unless it is done as a way of getting "green" exposure but I'd think Jupiter Ecology would be more specific for that. On it's own it's like having vegetarian gravy on your steak!

    agreed all round, and good analogy:D. i assumed that it was an intended 'exposure' rather than an investment decision based around Catapult's ethical stance.
  • planteria
    planteria Posts: 5,322 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    you don't Have To get exposure to particular markets, even the US. i tend to think that in some ways FTSE100 companies are 'similar' to US equivalents, and they are here, with easy access. and balancing with markets which are higher risk but higher growth compliment the UK well.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.7K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.8K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.6K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.8K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 601.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.7K Life & Family
  • 259.7K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.