We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Is this legal?

We are in the process of buying a house.
The survey showed some issues and we have obtained quotes for teh repairs and treatment and then informed the estate agents with an eye to renegotiation.
They said it was normal to go 50/50 and to request to reduce the cost of offer price so we did this.
The vendor came back with a lower reduction.
I told the estate agent that we need to keep our loan to value the same which means that the reduction would only give us a tiny bit of money to do the work and a small reduction in our monthly payments.

They suggested that we keep the selling price the same, and that the vendor gives a cheque to the EA to be passed to us between exchange and completion.

So, is this legal? The other option is for her to pay the contractors but everyone has told me that I need to remain the client and have the contractor work for me so that corners aren't cut (which makes sense)

thank you for any responses
«13

Comments

  • googler
    googler Posts: 16,103 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Don't do it. What will you do if the cheque doesn't materialise? There won't be anything in the contract for the house purchase that mentions it.
  • Mobeer
    Mobeer Posts: 1,851 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Academoney Grad Photogenic
    It's legal for them to write a cheque to you. It's also legal for them to cancel the cheque before you ever get to cash it.
  • mrginge
    mrginge Posts: 4,843 Forumite
    I know a retired nigerian general who needs somewhere to hold his $20m fortune if you're interested....
  • nah she isn't that sort of person. I know anyone can say that but she is an elderly woman and isn't the sort to do that.

    However- how about if instead the money was transferred to the solicitor and we got it that way?
  • googler wrote: »
    Don't do it. What will you do if the cheque doesn't materialise? There won't be anything in the contract for the house purchase that mentions it.

    how about if we do put it in the contract?
  • mrginge
    mrginge Posts: 4,843 Forumite
    how about if we do put it in the contract?

    Then that would a vendor gifted deposit and your mortgage company would not allow it
  • jjlandlord
    jjlandlord Posts: 5,099 Forumite
    Mobeer wrote: »
    It's legal for them to write a cheque to you. It's also legal for them to cancel the cheque before you ever get to cash it.

    No, it's not legal to dishonour a cheque, which is an unconditional promise to pay.

    It does not mean that what the EA proposes is a good idea for OP, though.
  • jjlandlord wrote: »
    No, it's not legal to dishonour a cheque, which is an unconditional promise to pay.

    It does not mean that what the EA proposes is a good idea for OP, though.

    So discounting the possibility of her cancelling the cheque- why would this be bad for us?
  • mrginge wrote: »
    Then that would a vendor gifted deposit and your mortgage company would not allow it

    What would you suggest instead?
  • mrginge
    mrginge Posts: 4,843 Forumite
    So discounting the possibility of her cancelling the cheque- why would this be bad for us?

    Because you will have lied to your mortgage company and solicitor.
    There is no up side for you on this deal. You take all the risk and end up over paying for the house.

    Dare i suggest you tell the EA you will only pay the amount of the valuation?
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.4K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 601.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.6K Life & Family
  • 259.2K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.