We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Government should help those without bank of mum and dad
Comments
-
I see.
So when you say Government should help those without bank of mum and dad you don't mean that the government should help those without bank of mum and dad.
That's good to know.
He never said that.
Even when it's there for all to see on the first line of the first post, he never typed it.
You're just putting words in his mouth again, tsk!
Don't blame me, I voted Remain.0 -
I see.
So when you say Government should help those without bank of mum and dad you don't mean that the government should help those without bank of mum and dad.
That's good to know.
...And that's pathetic.
I suppose if we are to follow this scheme Generali on his recent thread "Your !!!!!! is not canadian enough" is what he thinks, rather than what the thread is discussing and you will duly take him to task?0 -
Graham_Devon wrote: »...And that's pathetic.
I suppose if we are to follow this scheme Generali on his recent thread "Your !!!!!! is not canadian enough" is what he thinks, rather than what the thread is discussing and you will duly take him to task?
Generali's thread contains a link to an article stating "You !!!!!! is not Canadian enough". We can therefore conclude this is not necessary what Generali thinks or whether or not Generali has any view on Canadian !!!!!! at all.
Your post however says "Government should help those without bank of mum and dad". If this is related to a current news report or if you are quoting someone, please do so and edit your post.
Until then we can only assume this is your opinion.
But you knew that.Don't blame me, I voted Remain.0 -
Of course the poor would be in their place with no way out. (Not that there is much chance of escaping today).
No, other than being born in an NHS hospital, supported through childhood with child benefit, educated for free to age 18, offered cheap loans to go to the world's best universities, and then given a generous safety net for the rest of their lives, "the poor" are simply given no help whatsoever to escape their lowly start in life.
Of course, back in the real world, it takes real concerted effort over decades to throw away the advantages that everyone born in the UK gets. To be born, raised, and educated here, and still fail, that takes a special kind of person.0 -
No, other than being born in an NHS hospital, supported through childhood with child benefit, educated for free to age 18, offered cheap loans to go to the world's best universities, and then given a generous safety net for the rest of their lives, "the poor" are simply given no help whatsoever to escape their lowly start in life.
Of course, back in the real world, it takes real concerted effort over decades to throw away the advantages that everyone born in the UK gets. To be born, raised, and educated here, and still fail, that takes a special kind of person.
Of course the elite stay ahead because of better genetics right?
I do not advocate giving everything to people free but if you are serious about allowing other people to buy houses then maybe we should restrict buy to let, mass immigration and also build more homes. All three have an impact.0 -
is that unreasonable?
I couldn't afford to buy in a decent part of London over 30 years ago.
So unsure why it should be any different now.
I used to walk to work. But to buy my first property moved from the Reigate\Redhill area to Biggin Hill. Then commute back in.
Now everybody expects to be given something on a plate. Not make do and adjust to the available options.0 -
The gov should do all it can to help the young0
-
If you can't afford to raise a 5% deposit over a few years then you can't really afford the risk of a mortgage IMO. What if circumstances or interest rates change? What if the boiler needs replacing? Or the bathroom springs a leak? The sort of sums being used to save a deposit should continue to be able to be put away in case of difficult times once you own a house.
My husband lodged instead of renting a flat in order to save money for a deposit for his first flat. We live to a budget. We take leftovers for lunch. Neither of us had any deposit from our parents. Payrises mean more is paid off the mortgage not spent on day to day life (obviously we have small treats). His first home was a 2 bed flat (1.5bed) that I moved into. He made a small amount of money on this but most of the equity for the next deposit came from saving and overpaying the mortgage. Then we bought a small two bed terrace in a better area. We saved hard to extend the downstairs space without extending the mortgage and yes we made money. We are now on our way to being mortgage free with a 4bed detached house. Every spare penny finds it's way to our mortgage. We don't have other debt. We research holidays etc to find the best deal. We have weekends in luxury hotels but use a groupon deal etc etc.0 -
Of course the elite stay ahead because of better genetics right?
What a bizarre point of view. Let me guess, this "elite" scratch each others' backs, maybe have a secret handshake, or perhaps collude down at the synagogue to keep you down?
Back in the real world, there simply is not an unchanging elite, and a failure to get ahead tends to be down to each person's decisions.
The problem is, of course, that if someone is struggling it's often driven by decisions made years or decades earlier, and it's far easier to just invent a shadowy "elite" who are responsible for not giving people a chance. It doesn't make it true, of course, but it's much easier than taking responsibility.0 -
Exactly right.Thrugelmir wrote: »I couldn't afford to buy in a decent part of London over 30 years ago.
So unsure why it should be any different now.
I used to walk to work. But to buy my first property moved from the Reigate\Redhill area to Biggin Hill. Then commute back in.
Now everybody expects to be given something on a plate. Not make do and adjust to the available options.
Too many of those that expect low house prices are those that have made bad life choices and bad financial decisions and then there are others that have worked hard to get on the property ladder.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards