We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

advise for FTP, flats...

Hi Guy's..

Iv'e looked at a flat block with 6 flat's an ideal location, only one of the flat's is vacant and the freeholder is selling the flat's in there current conditions with new 999 year leases (need work here and there basically...) one of the flat's is actually very nice and I'd like to think about going for it as it needs less work doing, they have been on the market for a while due to most needing work so think I could get a good deal here as currently listed for 89,950

My question is has anyone been in this position before and how does the maintenance end up working out on the building if it needs work and not all the flat's are vacant? the ground rent is £50.00 and maintenance is payed by shop below at 34% and flat's 66% in total..

would lenders avoid this situation ?

Comments

  • G_M
    G_M Posts: 51,977 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    ak74 wrote: »
    Hi Guy's..

    Iv'e I've looked at a flat block with 6 flat's flats in an ideal location, only one of the flat's flats is vacant and the freeholder is selling the flat's flats in there their current conditions with new 999 year leases (need work here and there basically...) one of the flat's flats is actually very nice and I'd like to think about going for it as it needs less work doing, they have been on the market for a while due to most needing work so think I could get a good deal here as currently listed for 89,950

    My question is has anyone been in this position before and how does the maintenance end up working out on the building if it needs work and not all the flat's flats are vacant? the ground rent is £50.00 and maintenance is payed by shop below at 34% and flat's 66% in total..

    would lenders avoid this situation ?
    You'd need to read the lease to see how cost of maintenance is apportioned. But if, say, your flat had to pay 11% (one sixth of 66%) of roof repairs, then the fact that one or more of the other flats was vacant would not alter that.
  • cattie
    cattie Posts: 8,844 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    A 999yr lease is great & considered a virtual freehold. However, a lot of lenders are not too happy lending on properties which are above shops.

    Sometimes when a flat is above shops you will require a larger deposit if lender is only willing to give a lower LTV amount.

    As GM has mentioned, the 66% of maintenance for the flats will be shared out between all of the residential properties & whoever owns the properties will need to pay their share whether flats are being lived in or not. Usually larger flats pay a bigger share than a smaller flat.
    The bigger the bargain, the better I feel.

    I should mention that there's only one of me, don't confuse me with others of the same name.
  • ak74
    ak74 Posts: 13 Forumite
    Hi Cattie,

    Thanks for the reply, yes Iv'e mentioned to my broker about it being above a shop, it is slap bang in the middle of town, however it is not a restaurant or anything like that, and has it's own private entrance.

    that's good to know, I'm just guessing the freeholder would pay out the % for all the flat's that have no one living in them yet...

    Also would it be considered a bad move placing a low offer due to them being on the market for a while? :j

    The place has several two bedroom flat's, one that is the nicest layout at 89,950 below, and then another at 79,950, would it set me up for putting in a lower offer of 78,000 on it?
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 601.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 259.2K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.