We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
Help and advice requested on Santander Early repayment Charge

Irons85
Posts: 1 Newbie
Hi - I found out yesterday, just a few hours before we were due to transfer funds for completion on a house we are buying that an Early Repayment Charge (ERC) was applicable to our redemption statement, the figure of £5k is not insignificant and has caused no end of stress trying to source the funds and not affect completion.
We have in writing from our solicitors that this charge would not apply in the completion statement provided to us before we made the commitment to exchange.
Santander have now insisted this is applicable despite providing verbal confirmation to ourselves and our solicitors the ERC would not apply.
Does anyone have advice on who is at fault here? Clearly the blame is shared between Santander and the solicitors but I would be trying to get the ERC removed as a goodwill gesture from Santander instead of following it up with my solicitors formally due to an inaccurate completion statement provided and written confirmation the penalty would not apply.
Any thoughts or advice would be greatly appreciated.
We have in writing from our solicitors that this charge would not apply in the completion statement provided to us before we made the commitment to exchange.
Santander have now insisted this is applicable despite providing verbal confirmation to ourselves and our solicitors the ERC would not apply.
Does anyone have advice on who is at fault here? Clearly the blame is shared between Santander and the solicitors but I would be trying to get the ERC removed as a goodwill gesture from Santander instead of following it up with my solicitors formally due to an inaccurate completion statement provided and written confirmation the penalty would not apply.
Any thoughts or advice would be greatly appreciated.
0
Comments
-
You will get nowhere trying to blame solicitors IMHO. You would be better to use the Solicitor to bring pressure on Santander to honour their verbal agreement to waive the charge.0
-
What do the terms and conditions of your mortgage say......?
(why do people not read contracts when they sign them....?)0 -
Are you taking a new mortgage with Santander on the new property? My redemption showed the ERC but this did not get paid as used them on new property. I believe my solicitor had to fax them confirmation was going ahead with new mortgage deal (to fax number on redemption figure paperwork).0
-
Santander certainly used to have this rather unhelpful practice of telling solicitors that an early repayment charge was not applicable if a new mortgage with them was being taken out on the same terms as the old one - the solicitor was supposed to know about the terms of the old mortgage - why should he?
The client could say it was the same but it might not be, and the solicitor has to give a personal undertaking to pay off the mortgage to the buyer's solicitor, so must get it right.
I could never trust them unless I got a very specific statement that if new account number xxxxxxxx was completed at the same time as the redemption of old account zzzzzzzz no penalty was payable.
I would want to get this issue clear in writing before contracts were exchanged because a sum like £5K is pretty significant to the average client!RICHARD WEBSTER
As a retired conveyancing solicitor I believe the information given in the post to be useful assuming any properties concerned are in England/Wales but I accept no liability for it.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 349.7K Banking & Borrowing
- 252.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 452.9K Spending & Discounts
- 242.6K Work, Benefits & Business
- 619.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.3K Life & Family
- 255.5K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards