Search Function...

rosemac

BlueBella wrote: »

:j Yeah! I imagine KatieL and Hertzabrazas as two cute tweeting hummingbirds on a Friday - they feathery little wings going like the clappers! :j

lol Bella brilliant analogy:D I keep thinking of them wasting away unable to eat or drink while they research all those comps for us:o

BlueBella

hertzyabazas wrote: »

BlueBella, I wish I was as graceful and harmonious as a Hummingbird but the reality is it's more headless chicken clucking at anyone that comes near me on a Friday

Maybe a hawk on the hunt then? :j

BlueBella

A headless chicken would scare me!

JessicAhh

Blulu wrote: »

JessicAh in my humbles you are doing great stuff on this forum :T:T:T Don't be embarrassed by the odd dupe. Obviously, it's worth searching before posting, as you do anyway. But prolific posters dupe sometimes. Goes with the territory. We won't sack you for it

Thanks Blue

hertzyabazas wrote:

JessicAh, You're doing a great job and don't worry about the dupes. There wasn't that many anyway.

Thank you

Thanks also for the 'backward arrow' tip... The search function seems very clunky and quirky. I wonder what the search function is like in the new format forum - hopefully more 'on the ball' :cool:

It's a lovely community here - I think it's nice that we all have the opportunity to post comps... Without this, I think we'd end up missing some, especially on Twitter, where there are so many. I tend to search 'rt win' and I miss quite a few. There are so many different wordings used by companies for their comp posts. They are cruel to us comp-searchers :rotfl: