We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
getting a mortgage when bancrupt
Comments
-
The current bankrupcy laws which enable such a quick discharge were introduced to protect such entrepeneurs to allow them to chance their arm on new ventures.
It's good for the economy.
alledgedely0 -
Actually it was IVA's that were implemented for that reason 20 years ago, then a few unscrupulous agents realised they could make a lot of money off the system.
The bankruptcy laws were changed so not to penalise the people that genuinely fell on bad luck, the serial bankrupts are now treated far more harshly by this system. So yes it is good for the economy and makes absolute sense.
You want to point the finger at at what you consider inappropriate financial behaviour take a look at the liquidation of Heath Lambert Insurance brokers, this one reached the House of Commons it was so controversial, and it got that far without an official receiver in sight.0 -
thanks for your comments and i will tell what it IS with us people - its that just because we are bankcrupt people seem to think they can talk to you however they like. if you have nothing nice or productive to say then say nothing - thats basic manners.
i dont have to defend myself but most of us who are in this situation arent proud of it but have probably struggled for years to pay debts off or just put food on the table. please dont think im being dramatic with that, walk a mile in their shoes before you judge and count your own blessing because you just dont know what is around the corner
what is so wrong with me now wanting to start again???
not all of us are in this situation cos we like to spend money we dont have.
No one's saying you shouldn't start again. The whole cancer thing is majorly scary in its own right but my point was why on earth would you want to jump back into a big, fat debt situation with a large mortgage representing 90 - 100% of what is bound to be an over-priced property ? What happens when things get tight or your new partner bins you off (or vice versa) ? What happens when interest rates creep up ? What happens if you fall behind ? All these question apply to pretty much everyone but YOU - in YOUR situation - could find yourself accelerating towards a premature grave with the stress of it all.
Why not catch your breath, make sure this "new partner" isn't a complete tool and cease thinking that "doing alright" is an overpriced pile of bricks & mortar, a plasma tv and a poxy Ford Focus with slightly more espensive stereo than your next door neighbour's identical one parked on the drive. :rolleyes:0 -
I have to say I agree with tenroom (not on his/her first post, but certainly on the general gist of the second, though I think it could have been more tactfully put).
You've had a life-threatening, livelihood-threatening illness, which might (and God forbid it does) come back, leaving you unable to work. You've had debt problems which luckily the bankruptcy has enabled you to leave behind. The housing market is an over-inflated bubble which may pop at any moment, interest rates are on the up, and IMHO the last thing you should be doing now is placing yourself back in an overstretched situation.
What would you do if you took on a mortgage and then became ill again? Do you really think you'd be able to get insurance to protect against this, after such a recent bout of cancer?
I'm not trying to be harsh, but please, please think this through very carefully.
Operation Get in Shape
MURPHY'S NO MORE PIES CLUB MEMBER #1240
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 353.6K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.1K Spending & Discounts
- 246.6K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.1K Life & Family
- 260.7K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards