PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

How to split up the profit from this house sale

Options
245

Comments

  • getmore4less
    getmore4less Posts: 46,882 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper I've helped Parliament
    edited 3 March 2014 at 7:42PM
    jjlandlord wrote: »
    B&T, I think this is basically the same as post #6: profit shared in the same proportion as the investment.

    the investement also includes servicing the debt so you have to factor the equity that tghe debt bought as well as the deposit.
  • blackshirtuk
    blackshirtuk Posts: 544 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 500 Posts
    Depends on what was agreed at the time of purchase but if was agreed as 50-50 the following would apply
    Selling price £407k

    Mortgage £220k
    Gross equity £187K

    Person 1 paid 4k off the mortgage but no initial equity. He receives 4k

    Person 2 paid 1k off the mortgage and 100k equity he receives 101k

    187 - 4 -101= 82 divided equally = 41k

    Therefore
    Person 1 gets back 45K

    Person 2 gets back 142K

    Or if no agreement person 2 could argue that person 1 only owns 1% of the property and therefore is only entitled to 1% of the profit. in that case:

    Person 1 gets 4k + (187x1/100) = £5870

    Person 2 gets the rest 101000+187000-5870 = £282130

    It depends on your definition of "fairest" and what was agreed at the purchase!
  • jjlandlord
    jjlandlord Posts: 5,099 Forumite
    edited 3 March 2014 at 7:45PM
    the investement also includes servising the debt so you have to factor the equity that bought as well as the deposit.

    Which in total should be what OP listed:

    Person 1 invested 4k in total, person 2 101k.
    Seems only fair to split the proceeds along the same propertions: 4% v. 96%
  • BitterAndTwisted
    BitterAndTwisted Posts: 22,492 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    The original deposit wasn't equal and neither were the mortgage-payments. I dunno what logic they may have applied but presumably there must have been some. I can't see it.
  • getmore4less
    getmore4less Posts: 46,882 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper I've helped Parliament
    jjlandlord wrote: »
    Which in total should be what OP listed:

    Person 1 invested 4k in total, person 2 101k.
    Seems only fair to split the proceeds along the same propertions: 4% v. 96%

    thats not how it is done if you service £50k worth of debt you own £50k worth of equity that can go up/down in value.

    You get the value of the equity back and thenmn pay of the debt(or whats left).
  • dimbo61
    dimbo61 Posts: 13,727 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    House has gone up £82,000 in one year?
    London by any chance?
    Has work been done on property? What work and who paid ?
    Buying and selling costs? Someone paid stamp duty on £325K and solicitors fees, mortgage fees, searches, survey etc!
    Have both parties lived in the property? Capital Gains TAX?
    Selling costs more like £10/15K with London estate agents 2/3% plus legals etc ERC on Mortgage?
  • getmore4less
    getmore4less Posts: 46,882 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper I've helped Parliament
    edited 3 March 2014 at 7:58PM
    The original deposit wasn't equal and neither were the mortgage-payments. I dunno what logic they may have applied but presumably there must have been some. I can't see it.


    to round the numbers

    if the house was £200k and one paid cash £100k and one borrowed and serviced £100k they wopuld be 50:50

    if the house was £300k and one put down £100k cash and they each borrowed £100k is would be owned 1/3 and 2/3


    people seem to get confused by the mortgage, pretend they borrowed of their mums and paid cash for the house.

    the equity is split depending on hat htye pay. and that the ratio thye get back on sale.

    thye each pay off their share of the debt, to their mums or a mortgage it is the same.
  • jjlandlord
    jjlandlord Posts: 5,099 Forumite
    edited 3 March 2014 at 8:01PM
    thats not how it is done if you service £50k worth of debt you own £50k worth of equity that can go up/down in value.

    You get the value of the equity back and thenmn pay of the debt(or whats left).

    How is that different from my post?

    One person purchased about 4k worth of equity, the other 101k.
    These relative stakes are 4% v. 96% and they should balance in 25 years.
  • getmore4less
    getmore4less Posts: 46,882 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper I've helped Parliament
    Once you get the purchase equity shares right, the cost come off and it is net procceed that get split.

    Any CGT comes out of the appropriate shares
  • getmore4less
    getmore4less Posts: 46,882 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper I've helped Parliament
    jjlandlord wrote: »
    How is that different from my post?

    One person purchased about 4k worth of equity, the other 101k.
    These relative stakes are 96% v. 4%

    that is not what they bought


    person 1 house deposit: £0
    person 2 house deposit: £100k

    that buys 100/325 worth == 30.77%
    Total monthly fixed rate mortgage payments: £1,139
    person 1 monthly payments: £800 approx (to equal 50% share in 25 years)

    that buys (800/1139) * (225/325) 48.63% - 70.24% £158k of the debt
    person 2 monthly payments: £339 approx (to equal 50% share in 25 years)
    that buys (339/1139) * (225/325) 20.60% - 29.76% £67K of the debt

    person two bought 51.37%
    Person one bought 48.63%


    it's not the £ they spent its the full amount of the debt they serviced
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.7K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177K Life & Family
  • 257.5K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.