Fillers, fillers, fillers!!! Everyone Learns IT Eventually

TrulyMadly

aau1 wrote: »

call me crazy but I think the site will let you spell it "come" rather than your 3-letter variation :rotfl:

So are slang words not allowed now:huh:

aau1

Tinyshoes, I hope you have taken that tablet young lady

pattylabelle

LilacLillie wrote: »

Not been on PC all day, just logged into sada and found e-vouchers to the value of £2.53?
All in small amounts.
Now what I don't understand is how do they get that total?
They expire on 08/04/14, the order I did for the birds was on 08/03/14.
Does anyone think that these are the APG (bits of) e-vouchers for the birds order?
Will more come in now or is that it for a Tuesday and now have to wait till next Tuesday to see if balance comes into account?
The CC was easy, this APG online lark isn't.
So confused.............................
LL

Forgive me for saying so BUT it sounds like you may have messed things up by the phonecalls.

TrulyMadly

LilacLillie wrote: »

Not been on PC all day, just logged into sada and found e-vouchers to the value of £2.53?
All in small amounts.
Now what I don't understand is how do they get that total?
They expire on 08/04/14, the order I did for the birds was on 08/03/14.
Does anyone think that these are the APG (bits of) e-vouchers for the birds order?
Will more come in now or is that it for a Tuesday and now have to wait till next Tuesday to see if balance comes into account?
The CC was easy, this APG online lark isn't.
So confused.............................
LL

Lillie...can you post how much your shopping cost?
What APG you should have received etc

Savvybuyer

TrulyMadly wrote: »

So are slang words not allowed now:huh:

Only certain ones but not others;). It's all illogical you see, and almost impossible to predict in advance without further knowledge already being possessed. If you are "huh", imagine it for someone with Asperger's who ponders what the rules are or are not on a nearly daily basis:eek:, as the precise specifics are of course never set out - in any event I suspect we better move on as even discussing it (and potentially impliedly questioning or challenging site rules) might itself be off-limits for all I know (or don't).

Btw, I don't need clarification as to what is and isn't "acceptable" (whatever that may mean and to whom) as I continue along with my own internal mischievousness about neutrotypicals' inability to set out precise, accurate, one size fits all and entirely solely written rules. They never do - it always assumes something unwritten, impossible to intuitively possess in advance and learned some other (arguably unsatisfactory) way.(:rotfl:)

Your whole ":huh:" (presumably as a neutro-typical) demonstrates my point completely. (How could you not already know that wasn't allowed?:question::D:D:rotfl:)

Snap-ant

A cats guide to loving a human :A

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-InDy_7yXNk

Dormouse

Just a small note to say Mr A strawberries (400g?) for £2 do not show on APG at all, so don't count on it as a filler, in case someone wanted to use it in an APG shop.

I was doing a small A v S shop with stuff I needed anyway and some Shopitize bits and bobs (Penguins, Gooeys, Twirls) and luckily I had more than 8 items as strawberries didn't count.

Savvybuyer

Dormouse wrote: »

Just a small note to say Mr A strawberries (400g?) for £2 do not show on APG at all, so don't count on it as a filler, in case someone wanted to use it in an APG shop.

I was doing a small A v S shop with stuff I needed anyway and some Shopitize bits and bobs (Penguins, Gooeys, Twirls) and luckily I had more than 8 items as strawberries didn't count.

So no longer valid for comparison vs £1.69 at M?:eek:

mimi1234

Booo! Nigella had her twins well and truly wrapped up today. I thought they would have been on full show! Doh.

I wanted Chloe to win. Double doh!

Time for bed. Toodle pips.

TrulyMadly

Savvybuyer wrote: »

Only certain ones but not others;). It's all illogical you see, and almost impossible to predict in advance without further knowledge already being possessed. If you are "huh", imagine it for someone with Asperger's who ponders what the rules are or are not on a nearly daily basis:eek:, as the precise specifics are of course never set out - in any event I suspect we better move on as even discussing it (and potentially impliedly questioning or challenging site rules) might itself be off-limits for all I know (or don't).

Btw, I don't need clarification as to what is and isn't "acceptable" (whatever that may mean and to whom) as I continue along with my own internal mischievousness about neutrotypicals' inability to set out precise, accurate, one size fits all and entirely solely written rules. They never do - it always assumes something unwritten, impossible to intuitively possess in advance and learned some other (arguably unsatisfactory) way.(:rotfl:)

Your whole ":huh:" (presumably as a neutro-typical) demonstrates my point completely. (How could you not already know that wasn't allowed?:question::D:D:rotfl:)

We celebrate our differences:)