We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
The MSE Forum Team would like to wish you all a Merry Christmas. However, we know this time of year can be difficult for some. If you're struggling during the festive period, here's a list of organisations that might be able to help
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Has MSE helped you to save or reclaim money this year? Share your 2025 MoneySaving success stories!
Tesco's Canvas Photo Centre Refused a Refund Help and advice please
Comments
-
ThumbRemote wrote: »Apologies, quoted the £70 stated by notanewuser. They'd got everything else wrong, I should have realised that was wrong too.
Right, it's someone else's fault that you failed to read the OP properly ?0 -
notanewuser wrote: »Please show me the exact clause that allows a customer to reject an order, accept a replacement and then demand a refund before the replacement is produced.
Ah, so now you're on a completely different tack to post 2.
OP has indicated a replacement would be acceptable. This now falls outside the scope of the SoGA, for both OP and Tesco. It could argued that Tesco had no legal right to offer a replacement to OP; the only option the SoGA gives is to refund and let OP choose to place a new order if they wish.0 -
-
ThumbRemote wrote: »Where did I say I failed to read the OP properly?
Clearly I failed to remember the OP properly. The two are quite different.
Is that all you've got? Oh dear!0 -
ThumbRemote wrote: »Ah, so now you're on a completely different tack to post 2.
OP has indicated a replacement would be acceptable. This now falls outside the scope of the SoGA, for both OP and Tesco. It could argued that Tesco had no legal right to offer a replacement to OP; the only option the SoGA gives is to refund and let OP choose to place a new order if they wish.
That works on the theory that Tesco are obligated to educate the customer on their legal rights - they are not.
Tesco produced a product (through a third party I don't doubt), there was a flaw, customer complained, customer accepted a reprint of the item.
Customer then went online and saw it was half price if you began a transaction NOW. As the customers transaction was already in place and as the customer accepted the reprint of the item they aren't then legally entitled to a refund.
The fact remains that Tesco are not legally obligated to retrospectively apply a price offered today on an order placed prior to its existence.
The OP accepted Tesco's offer to buy the item at the price on offer at the time and that is the contract in place.0 -
Can a customer just reject custom, made to order items with no comeback?
Doesn't sound quite right.0 -
-
ThumbRemote wrote: »If they fail to conform to contract, yes.
Would not the offer to reprint, bring them back within contract?0 -
You once again fail to realise that by accepting the offer of a replacement they have formed a new contract, rejection is no longer possible. Please try to understand the basic concept of contract law.ThumbRemote wrote: »If they fail to conform to contract, yes.0 -
post #13 would contradict that.One important thing to remember is that when you get to the end of this sentence, you'll realise it's just my sig.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.9K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.9K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.7K Spending & Discounts
- 246K Work, Benefits & Business
- 602.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.8K Life & Family
- 259.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards