We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The ELITE- home of big birds, burgers and beautiful people!
Comments
-
Savvybuyer wrote: »I know. (I think I 'know', anyway:o:o. What is 'knowledge'? Degrees of knowledge and states etc..?!?:rotfl:) But looking to FC to expand on that a little.:)
I don't know that I understand it savvy....I just record it and enjoy the laughs.
I did have an interesting conversation with DS2s form teacher recently. She was telling me how he has fitted well into school and how nice it is to see his classmates being so supportive to him. I mentioned how I had been afraid of him being bullied because he is naive and very trusting and not street wise at all. She said it's impossible to bully someone who doesn't give a s**t about what anyone thinks about them......and it's true. He's uninsultable (is that a word?):rotfl::rotfl:
0 -
Had to teach this very thing (the three-part theory of knowledge).Justfied true belief.
Justified -you've got a reason to believe it and didn't just guess
True - maps onto reality and doesn't contradict the evidence)
Belief - you hold it yourself as knowledge and don't think it's a myth of some kind.
Oh how deep zag0 -
Had to teach this very thing (the three-part theory of knowledge).Justfied true belief.
Justified -you've got a reason to believe it and didn't just guess
True - maps onto reality and doesn't contradict the evidence)
Belief - you hold it yourself as knowledge and don't think it's a myth of some kind.
I did have a 'good' answer to this, but it is now lost in the midsts of time:(. Something about degrees of "knowledge", e.g. actual knowledge, presumed knowledge and constructive knowledge. (Some law case from 1993(?) - I've now found/re-found some about constructive trusts but it wasn't those.) Or, perhaps, Donald Rumsfeld's known knowns and known unknowns (isn't Google searching, at this moment, brilliant? I can pretend to know more than I do, though, now I have found out about it again (more who had said that rather than what he had said), I do know it now again. I think). (Sometimes I think I "know" and it turns out I do not. So how can I ever "know" anything?)
:oWhat's "reality"?:question::think: And only "maps onto" it - so that it doesn't have to be it.
Anyway, no-one but me could go even deeper.0 -
I wonder if he will show more discretion with tomorrows date
What tweets?:rotfl::rotfl::rotfl:Sealed pot challenge number 003 £350 for 2015, 2016 £400 Actual£345, £400 for 2017 Actual £500:T:T £770 for 2018 £1295 for 2019:j:j spc number 22 £1,457Stopped Smoking 22/01/15:D:D::dance::dance:- 5 st 1 1/2lb :dance::dance:0 -
Savvybuyer wrote: »You did go a bit over didn't you? But fun:D. Fun way of shopping - all my colleagues think shopping is a chore and boring - but, I tell you, this way is a little more fun:rotfl::rotfl:. (Especially as we save so much.) Oh gawd...putting those Crunchies vs M:eek:. Otherwise, I like that people have the ability to do M comps. fairly well now the M prices are on msm:T:T. Even though I think it's still very occasionally hit and miss - T doesn't use msm and I think APG is still on instore pricing - which means some items showing on msm as N/A for M do in fact compare (some of them favourably) whilst others, showing good pricing for M on msm, still return N/A:mad:.:rotfl::rotfl:
Remembered that didn't have any at home for my DGD. Glad that I got them as she wanted to stay tonight. In her bad books because I've run out of crunchie blasts, (at last):rotfl::rotfl::rotfl:
0 -
Sealed pot challenge number 003 £350 for 2015, 2016 £400 Actual£345, £400 for 2017 Actual £500:T:T £770 for 2018 £1295 for 2019:j:j spc number 22 £1,457Stopped Smoking 22/01/15:D:D::dance::dance:- 5 st 1 1/2lb :dance::dance:0
-
Remembered that didn't have any at home for my DGD. Glad that I got them as she wanted to stay tonight. In her bad books because I've run out of crunchie blasts, (at last):rotfl::rotfl::rotfl:
Staying out of DGD's bad books may be more important than the money:D. As for Crunchie Blasts, I think my relative bought those as well:(:(:( - they are now £3 each in some stores:eek::eek::eek: but they got them at £2 and failed:eek: to take up the mbuy let alone only buy them if there was a trigger available (which is what I now confine my buying of certain products to. They're now just not worth it otherwise, in my view:money:. Of course no good anyhow with A presently being more than 10% off compared to everywhere else).
Right - I'm taking up every other post again:rotfl: - and editing posts to fit more onto them - so, I'll take a break for now and see you later!:):) (That said, don't see why I'm not sometimes worth every other post:p.)0 -
lookinforabargain wrote: »Would it be these ones?
http://www.tesco.com/groceries/Product/Details/?id=277552354
Excellent spot :cool:
Evening all
have you recovered from your night out? Was it good?0 -
TrulyMadly wrote: »Unsure this is acceptable.
Latest rules require written permission from at least 3 members
Please may I have written permission to go AWOL until the weekend, pretty please with a cherry on the top xxxxx:p:p:p:p:p:p:p:p
100
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.8K Spending & Discounts
- 244.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.5K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.1K Life & Family
- 257.8K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards