We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Empty Property over 2 years now

2»

Comments

  • agrinnall
    agrinnall Posts: 23,344 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    thesaint wrote: »
    Why should she?

    Because houses kept empty contribute to the shortage of accommodation and the growth of homelessness, especially in places such as London where there is a dire shortage anyway.
  • AdrianC
    AdrianC Posts: 42,189 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    thesaint wrote: »
    Why should she?

    Oooh, because she has an asset which she can't afford to maintain, so is losing value rapidly, whilst simultaneously costing her money that she similarly can ill afford.

    Regardless of the ethics of the house being empty, it's a mind-bendingly poor investment currently.
  • AdrianC wrote: »
    Oooh, because she has an asset which she can't afford to maintain, so is losing value rapidly, whilst simultaneously costing her money that she similarly can ill afford.

    Regardless of the ethics of the house being empty, it's a mind-bendingly poor investment currently.

    Is it really going to lose value faster than prices are going up in London at present?

    Additionally is it going to be cheaper to mothball it in a state of stable disrepair than keep it tip top until the time to sell it?

    Finally, why get wound up about other peoples investment decisions? She may have some significant emotional attachment to the place that she values above the relative financial costs. With no obligation to maintain the fence its only you that she is inconveniencing by not repairing it so what gain would she have from replacing it? Even if she were planning to sell it would make more sense to replace the fence immediately before selling so as to avoid further expenditure on it.

    If anything she has you over a barrel here, you can start a dispute over it and risk devaluing your own place or lump it.
  • Perhaps owner is simply getting pleasure from upset neighbour: Weird I grant but possible....
  • AdrianC
    AdrianC Posts: 42,189 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    vqmismatch wrote: »
    Additionally is it going to be cheaper to mothball it in a state of stable disrepair than keep it tip top until the time to sell it?

    Not even close.

    Replace a few roof tiles - ~£500 at most
    Replace entire roof, timbers, joists, ceilings... - ~many £k.
  • AdrianC wrote: »
    She could always sell the flamin' house, then...?

    She has changed 2 estate agent to sell the house so far. Second agent got her 5% lesser then asking price (as per her) but she's doesn't seems interested to sell.

    I find it weird that she "don't have any money" and leave the property empty for more than 2 years. If she would have rented the house for last 2 years it would have got her more than £30K by now.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 353.6K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.1K Spending & Discounts
  • 246.6K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 603K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.1K Life & Family
  • 260.7K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.