We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Faulty Microwave....Options?

2»

Comments

  • unholyangel
    unholyangel Posts: 16,866 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper

    Thank you very much for your swift response.

    I note that you now stock the same model at the same price but with a two year guarantee
    And ours was purchased under a 1 year guarantee.

    Would you than agree that by selling this item with a two year guarantee the partnership expects that the product should be of such a standard that it would be reasonable to expect that product to last for at least that length of time without fault?

    To suggest that you do not expect the product to last the duration of the guarantee would be negligent towards the customer and/or bad business economically as you would be repairing/replacing products you sold under at two year guarantee that you never expected to last two years.

    I suspect such company as John Lewis who we bought from in good faith would recognise the consumer rights I hold that any product purchased should "last a reasonable length of time"
    To sell a product that did not do so and deny recompense should by default breach my consumer rights.

    I'd be interested to hear your opinion on this matter. Below is the details of the proof of purchase

    Kind regards


    There are a few reasons a product may not last a reasonable length of time. One is being inherently faulty. Another is misuse or overuse.

    A warranty is in addition to your statutory rights so sometimes cover these types of scenarios. However your statutory rights only come into effect when the retailer is in the wrong. And after 6 months the burden of proof is on the consumer to prove the goods were inherently faulty and havent failed through misuse (for example). As per my reply to the OP, ask JL what they will consider as proof of an inherent fault. Most likely an independent report.
    You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means - Inigo Montoya, The Princess Bride
  • I agree so I did just that

    JL agreed to cover the cost of an inspection by one of their approved technicians

    When I informed them the cost would be £50 they agreed that it was uneconomical and have now agreed to replace the unit FOC

    Proof that it is always worth the effort to at least argue the toss
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 601.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.6K Life & Family
  • 259.2K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.